Preview

The world of new economy

Advanced search

BRAZIL: TRAPPED IN THE MIDDLE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

In the XXI century Brazil has become one of the world leaders and, thanks to the reforms of the economy and society, made the transition from an authoritarian regime to establishing democracy. It is an event of historical importance for the global economy, the South American continent, the BRICS countries, as well as a lesson and experience for the transformation of other countries with a medium level of development. The success of the previous stage has revealed new challenges in the country. After the presidential elections of 2014, the painful loss of the «domestic» World Cup and corruption scandals of 2015, the country was pulled into the recession that threatens the long-term development goals.The future of Brazil is the fate of the most important economic experiment, going on before our eyes. We need to understand the reason for this turn of events and what the prospects are. What happened? There are three options: a natural for a market economy decline in growth rates; errors of economic policy, or a case when thesesame factors are manifestations of «middle-level development trap». The authors intend to show that this is a combination of all three options.

About the Authors

LEONID MAZKOVICH Grigoriev
SRU HSE
Russian Federation


VIKTORIJA ALEKSANDROVNA Pavlyushina
SRU HSE
Russian Federation


References

1. Григорьев Л. М. Экономика переходных процессов. Т. 1. М.: МУМ, 2010. Grigor’ev L. M. Economy transients Т. 1 [Ekonomika perekhodnykh protsessov Т. 1]. Moscow, MUM, 2010. T. 1.

2. Grigoryev L., Parshina E. Economic dynamics of the countries of the world in the years 1992-2010: Inhomogeneity of growth - VI brics academic forum / editors: Renato Coelho Baumann, Tamara Gregol de Farias. Brasília, IPEA, 2014, pp. 57-77.

3. Bénédicte de la Brière and Kathy Lindert, «Reforming Brazil’s Cadastro Ú nico to Improve the Targeting of the Bolsa Família Program» Social Protection Discussion Paper Series no. 0527 (The World Bank, June 2005): 9.

4. Carlos Guanziroli. PRONAF dez anos depois: resultados e perspectivas para o desenvolvimento rural. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 45, no. 2 (2007): 305.

5. Rivera Castiñera et al. Impacto de Los Programas. URL: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5jzb6w1rt99p. pdf? expires=1424694142&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=5B878AEDEB00A894E76C4858EEDC0E6A.

6. Kathy Lindert, Anja Linder, Jason Hobbs, and Bénédicte de la Brière. The Nuts and Bolts of Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program: Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers in a Decentralized Context. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series no. 0709 (The World Bank, May 2010): 68.

7. Rosa Maria Marques, Á quilas Mendes, and Camila Kimie Ugino. A Previdência social em Pauta: notas para refl exão. Argumentum 2, no. 1.

8. Sarah de Sainte Croix March 17, 2012. The Brazilian economy - what went wrong? - Brazil saw secondslowest growth since 2003. Analysts say not to worry.


Review

For citations:


Grigoriev L.M., Pavlyushina V.A. BRAZIL: TRAPPED IN THE MIDDLE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT. The world of new economy. 2016;(2):28-37. (In Russ.)

Views: 689


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-6469 (Print)
ISSN 2220-7872 (Online)