Inequality of World Development as a Global Challenge: «Response» Models

The inequality of world development as a global «challenge» creates instability of the world economy, leads to an increase in social tension, and along with the threat of climate change, is a priority problem for humankind. The study aims to reveal the parameters and dynamics of global inequality, show its direction, tendencies, and assess the Western and Chinese models («responses») to this challenge, which is a highly urgent scientific and practical task. The research methods are based on developing the concept of inequality in world development using quantitative and qualitative analysis following the «challenge-response» law. For quantitative analysis, we used modern methods of statistical analysis, in particular, quantile regressions. Based on the received results, we concluded and substantiated that the main challenge of our time is the inequality of world development, which has increased under the influence of the pandemic. We have shown that despite the decrease in the share of high-income countries (notably the G7 countries) in world GDP, the trend towards an increase in the gap in per capita income between high and middle-income countries has continued. We also revealed the indicator of labour share in GDP for high and middle-income countries, confirms the hypothesis of increasing inequality between capital owners and workers in several countries over the past 20 years, particularly the United States. We have shown that the Western model of the world order is not focused on solving inequality. The results obtained can be used to develop concepts and models for reducing global inequality.

1. Malthus T. R. An essay on the principle of population. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. 172 p. (Oxford World’s Classics Series).

2. Wallerstein I. M. World-system analysis: An introduction. Durham, London: Duke University Press; 2004. 109 p.

3. Bagdasaryan V, Sulakshin S. Superiority, appropriation, inequality. Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert; 2013. 304 p. (In Russ.).

4. Dabla-Norris E., Kochhar K., Suphaphiphat N., Ricka F., Tsounta E. Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. IMF Staff Discussion Note. 2015;(13). URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1513.pdf

5. Stiglitz J. E. The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company; 2012. 560 p.

6. Klinov V. G., Sidorov A. A. World trends in the distribution of national income and problems of economic and social development. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018;(7):30–44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2018–7–30–44

7. Kazantsev S. V. The danger of social-economic inequality. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2016;(4):51–61. (In Russ.).

8. Alvaredo F., Chancel L., Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. World inequality report 2018. Paris: World Inequality Lab; 2017. 298 p. URL: https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf

9. Klinov V. Trends in the distribution of income between labor and capital: Factors, consequences and problems of adjustment. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2016;(7):64–77. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2016–7–64–77

10. Piketty T. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014. 685 p.

11. Koenker R., Hallock K. F. Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2001;15(4):143–156. DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.4.143

12. Balashova S. A., Abramova A. A. Innovation and productivity: The case of Nordic countries. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika = RUDN Journal of Economics. 2021;29(1):88–98. DOI: 10.22363/2313–2329–2021–29–1–88–98

13. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business; 2012. 546 p.

14. Biryukov A. Inclusive development in the context of global revolutions. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies. 2011;13(12):80–87. (In Russ.).

15. Leonard M., Pisani-Ferry J., Shapiro J., Tagliapietra S., Wolff G. Geopolitics of the European Green Deal. Russia in Global Affairs. Feb. 02, 2021. (In Russ.).

16. Sekacheva A. B. Crisis phenomena in the European Union economy at the present stage of its development. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2021;15(1):91–99. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2220–6469–2021–15–1–91–99

17. Balashova S., Ratner S., Gomonov K., Berezin A. Modeling consumer and industry reaction to renewable support schemes: Empirical evidence from the USA and applications for Russia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2020;10(3):158–167. DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.8961

18. Schwab K., Vanham P. Stakeholder capitalism: A global economy that works for progress, people and planet. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2021. 304 p.

19. Postel-Vinay K. Globalization 4.0 and new modes of international cooperation. International Organisations Research Journal. 2020;15(2):60–67. DOI: 10.17323/1996–7845–2020–02–04

20. Cui Q., Sun J. Community of one destiny. Belaruskaya dumka. 2017;(5):68–74. (In Russ.).

21. Boyarkina A. V. Xi Jinping’s concept of a “community with a shared future for mankind” and ideas on “common destiny” in works of the Russian scholars and politicians. Diskurs-Pi = Discourse-P. 2020;(4):112–132. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/1817–9568–2020–10408

22. Kleiner GB. A new theory of economic systems and its applications. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2011;81(5):516–532.

23. Reshetnikova M. S. China’s AI experience: Industrial digitalization. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika = RUDN Journal of Economics. 2020;28(3):536–546. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313–2329–2020–28–3–536–546

24. Yiju L., Avdokushin E. F. Forming the foundations of the “Digital Silk Road.” Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2019;13(4):62–71. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2220–6469–2019–13–4–62–71