Preview

The world of new economy

Advanced search

Robotisation of the National Economy: Economic Effects

https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2026-20-2-54-69

Abstract

Against a backdrop of intensifying global technological competition and sanctions pressure, the issue of the robotisation of the national economy has become of critical importance for Russia. The objective of this article is to develop a macroeconomic model allowing for the assessment of the impact of robotisation in the manufacturing sector on aggregate labour productivity (LP), as well as to obtain quantitative estimates of the necessary investment resources, their returns, and the consequences for the labour market. The methodology is based on the construction of a nonlinear regression model using panel data for 20 countries over the period 2015–2023, drawing on statistics from the International Federation of Robotics (IFR), the World Bank, and the International Labour Organisation (ILOSTAT). The scientific novelty of the approach stems in the use of aggregated, cross-country data to indirectly assess the macroeconomic consequences of robotisation, as well as in the introduction of the concept of a “technological frontier” (saturation point), beyond which the returns from production automation decline. As a result, the study determines the upper limit of robotisation density and calculates productivity growth potential for the US, China and Russia. It has been demonstrated that, despite its modest macroeconomic impact (productivity growth in the Russian Federation is estimated at 53%), robotisation offers exceptionally high returns and enables Russia to strategically narrow the productivity gap with the US to 1.3 times. The article debunks the myth of ‘technological optimism’, without downplaying the fact that mass automation is not only economically justified but also essential for the nation to shift its technological status from that of an innovation recipient to that of an innovation donor.

About the Authors

E. V. Balatsky
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Russian Federation

Evgeny V. Balatsky — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Chief Research Fellow

Moscow



N. A. Ekimova
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Ekimova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher

Moscow



References

1. Jungmittag A., Pesole A. The impact of robots on labour productivity: A panel data approach covering 9 industries and 12 countries. JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology. 2019;(08). URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118044

2. Kromann L., Malchow-Møller N., Skaksen J.R., Sørensen A. Automation and productivity — a cross-country, cross industry comparison. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2020;29(2):265-287. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtz039

3. Graetz G., Michaels G. Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2018;100(5):753-768. DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00754

4. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P.Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2019;33(2):3-30. DOI: 10.1257/jep.33.2.3

5. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. NBER Working Paper. 2017;(23285). URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w23285

6. Dauth W., Findeisen S., Südekum J., Woessner N. DP12306 German robots — the impact of industrial robots on workers. CEPR Discussion Paper. 2017;(12306). URL: https://cepr.org/publications/dp12306

7. Autor D., Salomons A. Is automation labor-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share. NBER Working Paper. 2018;(24871). DOI: 10.3386/w24871

8. Blanas S., Gancia G., Lee T. Who is afraid of machines? Economic Policy. 2019;34(100):627-690. DOI: 10.1093/epolic/eiaa005

9. Carbonero F., Ernst E., Weber E. Robots worldwide: The impact of automation on employment and trade. International Labour Office Working Paper. 2018;(36). URL: http://pinguet.free.fr/ilo648063.pdf

10. Cette G., Devillard A., Spiezia V. The contribution of robots to productivity growth in 30 OECD countries over 1975-2019. Economics Letters. 2021;200:109762. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109762

11. Eder A., Koller W., Mahlberg B. The contribution of industrial robots to labor productivity growth and economic convergence: A production frontier approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2024;61(2):157-181. DOI: 10.1007/s11123-023-00707-x

12. Ballestar M.T., Díaz-Chao Á., Sainz J., Torrent-Sellens J. Impact of robotics on manufacturing: A longitudinal machine learning perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;162:120348. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120348

13. Koch M., Manuylov I., Smolka M. Robots and firms. The Economic Journal. 2021;131(638):2553-2584. DOI: 10.1093/ej/ueab009

14. Dottori D. Robots and employment: Evidence from Italy. Economia Politica. 2021;38(2):739-795. DOI: 10.1007/s40888-021-00223-x

15. Fernández-Macías E., Klenert D., Antón J.I. Not so disruptive yet? Characteristics, distribution and determinants of robots in Europe. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2021;58:76-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.03.010

16. Acemoglu D., Lelarge C., Restrepo P. Competing with robots: Firm-level evidence from France. AEA Papers and Proceedings. 2020;110:383-388. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20201003

17. Deng L., Plümpe V., Stegmaier J. Robot adoption at German plants. IWN Discussion Papers. 2020;(19). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/228627/1/iwh-dp2020-19rev.pdf

18. Schneider F. Do robots boost productivity? A quantitative meta-study. MPRA Paper. 2024;(123392). URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/123392/1/MPRA_paper_123392.pdf

19. Gurlev I.V. Digitalization of the Russian economy and problems of robotics. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2020;12(4):36. URL: https://esj.today/PDF/08ECVN420.pdf (In Russ.).

20. Arkhipova L.S., Melnikova D.M. Assessment of modern barriers affecting digitalization of Russian labor market. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal. 2022;(2):2. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/1999-2645-2022-270-2

21. Fedyunina A.A., Gorodnyi N.A., Simachev Yu.V. Industrial robotics market in Russia under sanctions: In search of supply and demand drivers. EKO: vserossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = ECO Journal. 2024;(2):91-107. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2024-2-91-107

22. Igoshina D. R. Features of digitalization of business processes in companies of small and medium entrepreneurship. Industrial’naya ekonomika = Industrial Economics. 2021;(5-11):1092-1097. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47576/2712-7559_2021_5_11_1092

23. Ermolov I. L. Role of industrial robots in perspectives of Russian economy. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2019;(10):127-129. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2019.252.10.015

24. Starovatova D.A. The relationship between robots and labour productivity: Does business scale matter? Journal of New Economy. 2023;24(1):81-103. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2023-24-1-4

25. Fedyunina А.A., Gorodnyi N.A., Simachev Yu.V. The impact of robotization on productivity of manufacturing firms in Russia. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2023;21(1):66-88. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21638/spbu18.2023.104

26. Anisimov A.Yu., Aleksakhina S.A., Kozlova U.A., Gorshkova A.A. Assessing the impact of automation and robotics on labor productivity and industrial modernization. Drukerovskii vestnik. 2025;(4):169-182. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17213/2312-6469-2025-4-169-182

27. Romanova I.V., Igishev A.V. The impact of robotics on labor productivity and qualification requirements for personnel in high-tech industries. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy resheniya = Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2025;3(5):38-49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.05.03.006

28. Urunov A.A., Rodina I.B. Influence of artificial intelligence and the Internet — technologies on national labor market. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2018;(1):138-142. (In Russ.).

29. Zemtsov S. P. Robots and potential technological unemployment in the Russian regions: Review and preliminary results. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2017;(7):142-157. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-7-142-157

30. Tolkachev S.A., Kulakov A.D. Robotization as the direction of neoindustrialization (on the example of the USA). Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2016;(2):79-87. (In Russ.).

31. Balatsky E., Raptovsky A. Innovation and investment as factors of production efficiency. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy. 2007;(1):3-27. (In Russ.).

32. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Innovation-technology matrices and national economic development strategies. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2019;10(5):9-19. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-5-2

33. Balatsky E. Identification of the technology frontier. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance. 2021;15(3):23-34. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2021.3.23.34

34. Balatsky Ye.V. Technological diffusion and investment decision. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of The New Economic Association. 2012;(3):10-34. (In Russ.).

35. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Driving the economy: The role of a special economic sector. Journal of New Economy. 2020;21(3):5-27. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-3-1


Review

For citations:


Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Robotisation of the National Economy: Economic Effects. The world of new economy. 2026;20(2):54-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2026-20-2-54-69

Views: 267

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-6469 (Print)
ISSN 2220-7872 (Online)