Economic Models of Innovation Activity Based on Digital Platforms
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2023-17-2-6-17
Abstract
The relevance of the topic of economic models of innovative activity based on digital platforms is due, firstly, to the importance of the transition of the modern economy to an innovative development path; secondly, the importance of analyzing international experience in the development of innovative systems in order to possibly use the approaches that have developed in the world to form a national model of innovative development.
The purpose of this study is to determine the possibility of using the experience of implementing innovative activity models in individual countries of the world in shaping the directions for the development of the economy of the Russian Federation in order to improve the indicators of its socio-economic development.
The object of the study is the development of innovative activities of economic entities in the context of digitalization; the subject of research is digital platforms. The authors analyzed the ranking of the most innovative countries in the world; the types of models of innovative activity of developed countries are identified (leadership in science, dissemination of innovations, stimulation of innovations); the authors also traced the relationship, for which model of innovation, what types of platforms are most characteristic. The article substantiates the fact that a significant number of effects from innovation activity is achieved through the use of certain technologies and the modernization (restructuring) of individual business processes in the implementation of inter-company interactions based on digital platforms. Based on the characteristics and features of each considered type, the authors propose the most appropriate types of digital platforms for use in the implementation of one or another model of innovative activity.
The practical significance of the proposals lies in the fact that, depending on the chosen development strategy, the use of one or another type of digital platform will be effective for a particular economic entity.
Keywords
innovation activity,
digital platforms,
economic models,
innovative development,
global innovation index
Supporting agencies: The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation within the framework of scientific project No. 22–28–20077.
About the Authors
E. V. Popov
Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Popov — D octor of Economics, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, The chief of the Center for Social and Economic Research and Expertise
Ekaterinburg
V. L. Simonova
Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktoriya L. Simonova — C and. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher of the Center for Social and Economic Research and Expertise
Ekaterinburg
A. D. Tikhonova
Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna D. Tikhonova — Researcher of the Center for Social and Economic Research and Expertise
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Szántó B. Innováció a gazdaság fejlesztésének eszköze: A műszaki fejlesztés elméleti-módszertani vizsgálata. Budapest: Műszaki Könyvkiadó; 1985. 264 p. (Russ. ed.: Szántó B. Innovatsiya kak sredstvo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Moscow: Progress; 1990. 296 p.).
2. Dosi G. The nature of innovation process. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete L., eds. Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter; 1988:221–238.
3. Freeman C. Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers; 1987. 155 p.
4. Lundvall B.-Å., ed. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers; 1992. 342 p.
5. Kolesnikova T. The innovation component of the Chinese economy. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Economic Journal. 2012;(4):31–39. (In Russ.).
6. Kokhno A. P. Efficiency of R&D financing. Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. 2013;(8–2):459–464. (In Russ.).
7. Malyutin D. L. Analysis and assessment of forming innovative environment in Japan. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Journal of Creative Economy. 2013;(5):65–69. (In Russ.).
8. Scott R. UK innovation strategy. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance. 2009;(4):16–21. (In Russ.).
9. Khromov G. S. Current state of scientific and technical systems of industrialized countries. In: Scientific research: Coll. sci. pap. Moscow: INION RAS; 2013:32–56. URL: http://inion.ru/site/assets/files/1555/2013_naukovedcheskie_issledovaniia.pdf (In Russ.).
10. Volostnov B. I., Kuz’mitskii A.A., Polyakov V. V. Innovative and technological development: Strategies, priorities, regularities. Moscow: Vash poligraficheskii partner; 2011. 351 p. (In Russ.).
11. Glaz’ev S. Yu., Gubanov S. S., Pogosov I. A. et al. Innovative development of the economy: International experience and problems of Russia. St. Petersburg: Nestor- Istoriya; 2012. 351 p. (In Russ.).
12. Mindeli L. E., Khromov L. E. Scientific and technical systems of industrialized countries at the beginning of the global economic crisis: 2007–2009. Moscow: Institute for the Development of Science RAS; 2012. 183 p. (In Russ.).
13. Ozimina L. A., Plotnikov V. A. Digital promotion: Theoretical aspects. Uchenye zapiski Mezhdunarodnogo bankovskogo instituta = Scientific Notes. International Banking Institute. 2019;(1):35–45. (In Russ.).
14. Chod J., Trichakis N., Tsoukalas G., Aspegren H., Weber M. On the financing benefits of supply chain transparency and blockchain adoption. Management Science. 2020;66(10):4378–4396. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3434
15. Cong L. W., Li Y., Wang N. Tokenomics: Dynamic adoption and valuation. The Review of Financial Studies. 2021;34(3):1105–1155. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhaa089
16. Fatehi S., Wagner M. R. Crowdfunding via revenue-sharing contracts. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management. 2017;10(3–4):407–424. DOI: 10.1561/0200000071
17. Malinova K., Park A. Tokenomics: When tokens beat equity. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.328682
18. Vasilyeva N. F., Kavura V. L. The model of the economy innovative development: International experience of implementation. Vestnik Instituta ekonomicheskikh issledovanii = Vestnik of Institute of Economic Research. 2016;(3):74–82. (In Russ.).
19. Golovina T. A., Polyanin A. V., Avdeeva I. L. Development of digital platforms as a competitiveness factor of modern economic systems. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy. 2019;14(4):551–564. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1994–9960–2019–4–551–564
20. Lovchikova E. I., Solodovnik A. I. Digital economy and financial infrastructure support: Relationship, problems and prospects. Banking sector: state, trends and development prospects. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. conf. Oryol: Oryol GAU; 2018:103–107. (In Russ.).
21. Polyanin A. V., Dokukina I. A. Digital platforms in public administration based on Agile management. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economy and Management. 2020;(1):126–131. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17308/econ.2020.1/2763
22. Vertakova Yu.V., Klevtsova M. G., Polozhentseva Yu. S. Indicators for assessing digital transformation of economy. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2018;(10):14–20. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Tikhonova A.D. Economic Models of Innovation Activity Based on Digital Platforms. The world of new economy. 2023;17(2):6-17. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2023-17-2-6-17
Views:
620
Email this article 