Ecological Public Policy of Russia and Latin America (On the Example of Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil)
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-2-30-42
Abstract
The article describes the main characteristics of the state environmental policy and their impact on political processes in Russia and a few Latin American countries. Through the prism of comparative analysis, the relationship between a person and his environment is considered through the mediation of ideological constructions and power relations, which help to display the existing contradictions between the culture and the natural environment of the countries in question. Thus, the author identified and analysed in this paper, for each of the countries their specific “development pattern” and presented possible scenarios in the field of environmental policy.
About the Authors
V. I. YakuninRussian Federation
Vladimir I. Yakunin — Dr Sci. (Politology Sciences), Head of the Department of Public Policy, Faculty of Political Science
Moscow
T. Yu. Rusakova
Russian Federation
Tatyana Yu. Rusakova — Candidate of Political Sciences, Leading Expert of the Research Association Centero, Assistant of the Department of Theory and Practice of Foreign Languages, Institute of Foreign Languages
Moscow
References
1. Boit A., Sakschewski B., Boysen L., Cano-Crespo A., Clement J., Garcia-alaniz N. et al. Largescale impact of climate change vs. land-use change on future biome shifts in Latin America. Global Change Biology. 2016;22(11):3689–3701. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13355
2. Campuzano C., Hansen A. M., De Stefano L., Martínez Santos M., Torrente D., Willaarts B. A., Blanco E., Castro L. F., Donoso G., Franco G., Kuroiwa J., Lucen M. N., Montenegro J. I., Pahlow M., Zhang G. Water resources assessment. In: Willaarts B. A., Garrido A., M. R. Llamas M. R., eds. Water for food security and wellbeing in Latin America and the Caribbean: Social and environmental implications for a globalized economy. Abingdon: Routledge; 2014:27–54. (Earthscan Studies in Water Resource Management).
3. Chevallier P., Pouyaud B., Condom T. Climate change threats to environment in the tropical Andes: Glaciers and water resources. Regional Environmental Change. 2011;11(1):179–187. DOI: 10.1007/s10113–010–0177–6
4. Leadley P. W., Krug C. B., Alkemade R., Pereira H. M., Sumaila U. R., Walpole M., Marques A., Newbold T., Teh L. S.L, van Kolck J., Bellard C., Januchowski-Hartley S.R., Mumby P. J. Progress towards the Aichi biodiversity targets: An assessment of biodiversity trends, policy scenarios and key actions. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD Technical Series. 2014;(78). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269845681_Progress_towards_the_Aichi_Biodiversity_Targets_An_Assessment_of_Biodiversity_Trends_Policy_Scenarios_and_Key_Actions
5. Grachev V. A. Vernadsky’s theory of noosphere as the basis for sustainable development. Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie = South of Russia: Ecology, Development. 2015;10(3):16–23. (In Russ.).
6. Moiseev N. N. To be or not to be… for humanity? Ulyanovsk: Ul’yanovskii Dom pechati; 1999. 288 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bolom Pale M. K’anel: Una construcción de la indentidad dialógica y espiritual de los tsotsiles en Huixtán, Chiapas. Etnoecológica. 2012;9(1):42–46.
8. Nunes O. V.R. Post-development as an alternative to experiences of urban governance: the Buen Vivir. V!14. 2017. URL: www.nomads.usp.br/virus/virus14/?sec=4&item=3&lang=en>
9. Santos E. C.S. Dilemas acerca da exploração petrolífera no Equador: Una cosa es con guitara otra con violín. Rio de Janeiro: Novas Edições Acadêmicas; 2016. 152 p.
10. Gudynas E. Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development. 2011;54(4):441–447. DOI: 10.1057/dev.2011.86
Review
For citations:
Yakunin V.I., Rusakova T.Yu. Ecological Public Policy of Russia and Latin America (On the Example of Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil). The world of new economy. 2022;16(2):30-42. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-2-30-42