Analysis of Factors of High-tech Industries Growth: A Case Study of the Late USSR 

Explanation of the role high-tech industries play in ensuring sustainable economic growth is significant in the contemporary environment. Also, it is relevant in theoretical discourses of modernization, neo-industrialization, and industrial policy that are similar in their structure. The purpose of the study is to assess the factors of dynamics of the most high-tech industries and the entire Soviet industry when having faced economic growth slowdown, with emphasis on institutional and technological components. The key hypothesis is that in the high-tech industries in the 1960s and 1980s, the institutional environment appeared to be a more significant factor than the technological level. The variety of the sources utilized includes calculations and estimates from the research literature and selected indicators from the official statistics. The econometric analysis of the data is based on an exogenous growth model in the form of the Cobb- Douglas production function, augmented with human capital in Mankiw, Romer, Weil (1992), modified in Didenko, Grineva (2020) by introducing variables that proxy for institutional and general technological dynamics. In this paper, we test it using lagged variables in per capita and rate-of-change terms. The marginal rate of technical substitution of physical by human capital, measured in such a way and indicating the flexibility of management of factors of production, exposed a stable level both in the entire industry of the USSR and its high-tech branches. At the same time, our key hypothesis found weak support.

1. Tolkachev S. A. Network industrial policy in the age of the new industrial revolution. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2018;(3):155–161. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/2221–2264–2018–39–3–9

2. Abdikeev N. M., ed. Institutional support for technological modernization of sectors of the Russian economy. Moscow: RuScience; 2020. 270 p. (In Russ.).

3. Timmer M. P., Szirmai A. Productivity growth in Asian manufacturing: The structural bonus hypothesis examined. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2000;11(4):371–392. DOI: 10.1016/S0954–349X(00)00023–0

4. Krasil’shchikov V.A., Belousov A. R., Gutnik V. P., Klepach A. N., Kuznetsov V. I. Modernization: Foreign experience and Russia. Moscow: Infomart; 1994. 115 p. (In Russ.).

5. North D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 159 p.

6. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business; 2013. 544 p.

7. Popov V. Life cycle of the centrally planned economy: Why Soviet growth rates peaked in the 1950s. In: Estrin S., Kolodko G. W., Uvalic M., eds. Transition and beyond: Studies in economic transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:35–57. DOI: 10.1057/9780230590328_3

8. Popov V. Mixed Fortunes: An Economic History of China, Russia, and the West. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. 191 р.

9. Didenko D. V., Grineva N. V. Analysis of the role of institutions and technologies in economic growth of the late USSR in a cross-country comparison. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2020;14(4):81–95. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2220–6469–2020–14–4–81–95

10. Smirnov S. Industrial output in the USSR and Russia, 1861–2012. Part I. Reconstruction of basic time–series. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013;(6):59–83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2013–6–59–83

11. Didenko D., Földvári P., Van Leeuwen B. The spread of human capital in the former Soviet Union area in a comparative perspective: Exploring a new dataset. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2013;4(2):123–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2013.03.002

12. Khanin G. I. Soviet economic growth: Analysis of Western estimates. Novosibirsk: EKOR; 1991. 150 р. (In Russ.).

13. Khanin G. I. Dynamics of economic development of the USSR. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1991. 270 р. (In Russ.).

14. Khanin G. I. Economic history of Russia in modern times (in 2 vols.). Vol. 1: Economy of the USSR in the late 30s — 1987. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University; 2008. 516 р. (In Russ.).

15. Steinberg D. The Soviet economy 1970–1990: A statistical analysis. San Francisco: International Trade Press; 1990. 338 р.

16. Glaz’ev S. Yu. Economic theory of technical development. Moscow: Nauka; 1990. 232 р. (In Russ.).

17. Solow R. M. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957;39(3):312–320. DOI: 10.2307/1926047

18. Mankiw N. G., Romer D., Weil D. N. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992;107(2):407–437. DOI: 10.2307/2118477

19. Anchishkin A. I. Forecasting the rates and factors of economic growth. Moscow: MAKS Press; 2003. 300 p. (In Russ.).

20. Yaremenko Yu. V. Theory and methodology of researching a multilevel economy. Bk. 1. Moscow: Nauka; 2000. 400 p. (In Russ.).

21. Weitzman M. L. Soviet postwar economic growth and capital–labor substitution. The American Economic Review. 1970;60(4):676–692.

22. Weitzman M. L. Industrial production. In: Bergson A., Levine H. S., eds. The Soviet economy: Toward the year 2000. London: George Allen & Unwin; 1983:179–190.

23. Gomulka S. Slowdown in Soviet industrial growth 1947–1975 reconsidered. European Economic Review. 1977;10(1):37–49.

24. Rosefielde S., Lovell C. A.K. The impact of adjusted factor cost valuation on the CES interpretation of postwar Soviet economic growth. Economica. 1977;44(176):381–392. DOI: 10.2307/2553571

25. Desai P. The production function and technical change in postwar Soviet industry: A reexamination. The American Economic Review. 1976;66(3):372–381.

26. Desai P. Total factor productivity in postwar Soviet industry and its branches. Journal of Comparative Economics. 1985;9(1):1–23. DOI: 10.1016/0147–5967(85)90002–2

27. Bergson A. Notes on the production function in Soviet postwar industrial growth. Journal of Comparative Economics. 1979;3(2):116–126. DOI: 10.1016/0147–5967(79)90010–6

28. Easterly W., Fischer S. The Soviet economic decline: Historical and Republican data. The World Bank Economic Review. 1995;9(3):341–371.

29. Voskoboynikov I. B. Accounting for growth in the USSR and Russia, 1950–2012. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2021;35(3):870–894. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12426

30. Gechert S., Havranek T., Irsova Z., Kolcunova D. Measuring capital–labor substitution: The importance of method choices and publication bias. Review of Economic Dynamics. 2021. In Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2021.05.003

31. Van Leeuwen B., Didenko D., Földvári P. Inspiration vs. perspiration in the economic development of the former Soviet Union and China (ca. 1920–2010). Economics of Transition. 2015;23(1):213–246. DOI: 10.1111/ecot.12060

32. Nureev R., Latov Yu. Between ‘real socialism’ and ‘oriental despotism’: The labyrinths of institutional economic development in Soviet Russia. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya = Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 2014;23(3):6–45. (In Russ.).

33. Kapeliushnikov R. I. Contra pan-institutionalism. Part I. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019;(7):119–146. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2019–7–119–146

34. Kapeliushnikov R. I. Contra pan-institutionalism. Part II. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019;(8):98–126. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2019–8–98–126