Transformations in the Monetary and Financial Policy of the European Union under the Influence of COVID‑19
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2021-15-4-48-57
Abstract
The article analyses institutional changes in monetary and financial policy mechanisms, including the temporary «freezing» of the Stability and Growth Pact as an extraordinary anti-crisis policy measure under the influence of the COVID‑19 pandemic. We considered the anti-crisis instruments of the operational mechanism of the unified monetary policy and their impact on the «inflation» of the ECB balance sheet. Trends and directions of strengthening the regulatory role of the ECB and the general budget of the EU in the integration processes in the European Union are analyzed. We based our research on dialectical, systemic and institutional approaches. Also, we used methods of comparative and statistical analysis. Based on our study, we revealed the features of the new approaches of the European Central Bank to the broad interpretation of the monetary policy strategy. Further, we identified transformations in the operating mechanism and tools of the unified monetary policy under the influence of the COVID‑19 pandemic. Finally, we determined and assessed the priority orientation of the EU general budget expenditures for 2021–2027 and new collective funds to tackle the crisis to promote innovation and improve the competitiveness of the European economy.
About the Authors
V. Ya. PishchikaRussian Federation
Viktor Ya. Pischik – DSc in Economics, Professor, Department of the Global
Moscow
P. V. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Peter V. Alekseev – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher of the Institute of the Global Economy and International Finance
Moscow
References
1. Mundell R. A. A reconsideration of the twentieth century. American Economic Review. 2000;90(3):327–340. DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.3.327
2. Frankel J. A., Rose A. K. The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. The Economic Journal. 1998;108(449):1009–1025. URL: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/arose/ocaej.pdf
3. Borko Yu. A. From a European idea to a united Europe. Moscow: Delovaya literatura; 2003. 463 p. (In Russ.).
4. Glukharev L. I., ed. Europe of change: Concepts and strategies of integration processes. Moscow: Kraft+; 2006. 352 p. (In Russ.).
5. Shishkov Yu. V. Integration processes on the threshold of the XXI century. Moscow: III tysyacheletie; 2001. 480 p. (In Russ.).
6. Shemyatenkov V. G. Euro: Two sides of the same c oin. Moscow: Ekonomika; 1998. 346 p. (In Russ.).
7. Butorina O. V. Economic history of the euro. Moscow: Ves’ Mir; 2020. 576 p. (In Russ.).
8. Pishchik V. Ya., Kuznetsov A. V., Alekseev P. V. European Economic and Monetary Union: 20 years after. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2019;63(9):76–85. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2019–63–9–76–85
9. Bazhan A. I., Gusev K. N. European Central Bank amid the financial crisis. Sovremennaya Evropa = Contemporary Europe. 2016;(3):93–103. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15211/soveurope32016100110
10. Dabrowski, M. Monetary arithmetic and inflation risk. Bruegel. Sept. 28, 2021. URL: https://www.bruegel.org/2021/09/monetary-arithmetic-and-inflation-risk
11. Pisanni-Ferry J. Central banking’s brave new world. Bruegel. Feb. 24, 2021. URL: https://www.bruegel.org/2021/02/central-bankings-brave-new-world/
12. Claeys G., Darvas Z., Demertzis M., Wolff G. The great COVID-19 divergence: Managing a sustainable and equitable recovery in the European Union. Policy Contribution. 2021;(11). URL: https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/PC-2021–11-ecofin-210521–1.pdf
13. Backholm K.-G. The Recovery Fund will not save Europe. InoSMI.ru. Aug. 18, 2020. URL: https://inosmi.ru/economic/20200818/247949915.html (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pishchika V.Ya., Alekseev P.V. Transformations in the Monetary and Financial Policy of the European Union under the Influence of COVID‑19. The world of new economy. 2021;15(4):48-57. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2021-15-4-48-57