Ranking of Regions of Russia by the Demographic Situation Considering the Level of Development of Social Infrastructure
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-4-96-109
Abstract
The article discusses the formation of the demographic situation in Russia, considering the influence on them of the parameters of the development of social infrastructure. Today, most regions of the country are characterized by a decrease in population. Moreover, it is the level of development of medicine, education and other components of social infrastructure that determine the living conditions of the population and, as a result, the processes of natural and migration movement of the population. The study aims to determine the quantitative parameters of this relationship and the formation based on the results of the received rating of the administrative entities of the Russian Federation. In the framework of the work, we used methods of retrospective analysis, grouping, cluster analysis, correlation and regression analysis, and other methods. Further, we formed a list of indicators characterizing the level of development of the social infrastructure of the territory and highlighted groups of indicators. We proposed An approach to the formation of integral indicators of the level of development of social infrastructure for individual components of the population movement. The regions of the Russian Federation were grouped by the totality of the parameters of the demographic situation and socio-economic factors. As a result of testing the approach, we formed private and integral ratings of the regions of Russia according to the ratio of the parameters of the demographic situation and the level of development of social infrastructure. The results can be used in the development of the state demographic policy.
About the Authors
R. V. FattakhovRussian Federation
Rafael V. Fattakhov — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor of Department of Public Finance
Moscow
M. M. Nizamutdinov
Russian Federation
Marsel M. Nizamutdinov — Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate Professor, Head of the Sector of economic and mathematical modelling
Ufa
V. V. Oreshnikov
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Oreshnikov — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior researcher of the Sector of economic and mathematical modelling
Ufa
References
1. Dash R. K., Sahoo P. Economic growth in India: the role of physical and social infrastructure. Journal of Economic Policy Reform. 2010;13(4):373–385.
2. Bielaczyc K. Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2006;(15):301–329.
3. Tatarkin A. I., Animitsa E. G. Formation of a paradigm theory of regional economics. Ekonomika regiona = The economy of the region. 2012;(3):11–21. (In Russ.).
4. Peters D. J., Hamideh S., Zarecor K. E., Ghandour M. Using entrepreneurial social infrastructure to understand smart shrinkage in small towns. Journal of Rural Studies. 2018;(64): 39–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.10.001
5. Fattakhov R. V., Nizamutdinov M. M., Oreshnikov V. V. Scientific and methodological aspects of the problem of modeling migration processes in the subjects of the Russian Federation. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: theory and practice. 2018;22(3):100–111. (In Russ.).
6. Fattakhov R. V., Nizamuttdinov M. M., Oreshnikov V. V. Analysis of spatial mobility of the population of the regions of Russia: trends and regulatory mechanisms. Ekonomika v promyshlennosti = Economics in industry. 2017;10(2):162–171. (In Russ.).
7. Bunkovsky D. V., Kapustyuk P. A. Remuneration as an element of value added created in the shadow economy. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossii = Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017;(4):158–168. (In Russ.).
8. Munyasya B. M., Chileshe N. Towards Sustainable Infrastructure Development: Drivers, barriers, strategies, and coping mechanisms. Sustainability. 2018;10(12):4341. DOI: 10.3390/su10124341
9. Altbach P. The Costs and Benefits of World-Class Universities. Academe. 2004;90(1):20–23.
10. Martyshenko S. N. Assessment and analysis of migratory moods in the student community of the Primorsky Territory. Informatsionnyye tekhnologii modelirovaniya i upravleniya = Information technology modeling and management. 2014;(6):467–479. (In Russ.).
11. Atnabaeva A. R. Study of the natural movement of the population in the Republic of Bashkortostan using the parametric method. Izvestiya Ufimskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = Vestnik Ufa Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019;(3):81–86. (In Russ.).
12. Ataeva A. G., Ulyaeva A. G. Interregional youth migration as a threat to the loss of human capital of the territory (based on the materials of the Republic of Bashkortostan and the regions of the Volga Federal District). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economy. 2018;(44):38–57. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Fattakhov R.V., Nizamutdinov M.M., Oreshnikov V.V. Ranking of Regions of Russia by the Demographic Situation Considering the Level of Development of Social Infrastructure. The world of new economy. 2020;14(4):96-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-4-96-109