Activity Analysis of the Economic Entity and Digital Culture

Subject. The modern economy is experiencing several crises related to the need for structural reforms and the solution to systemic problems. The solution to systemic and structural issues is influenced by the new business environment formed in the field of digital culture. It informs the participants of the national and international economy, dictates new requirements to economic entities, the results of their activities and the quality of business. New requirements of stakeholders influence the formation of the phenomenology of economic analysis in the era of digital culture.

Purpose. The purpose of the research was the author’s development of phenomenology of economic analysis (analysis of economic entities) and the system of standardisation of economic analysis in the digital economy.

Methodology. The author used methods of systems research (analysis and synthesis), comparative analysis, the method of analogies to solve the problems, and also the study of current economic literature and the use of structural analysis.

Results. Based on the analysis, the author obtained the following results. Result 1: Diagnosis of the specific features (phenomena) of digital culture as a new business environment. Detection of the positive features and disadvantages of digitalisation of the economy. Result 2: Detection of the system of the phenomena forming phenomenology of the economic analysis which includes not only the phenomenon of the analysis, but also the phenomenon of the object and the subject of analytical activity; two last phenomena are modified under the influence of digital culture. Result 3: Detection of the boundaries of digitalisation of economic analysis: unification of methodological approaches to the analysis of normal operations of economic entities of different types (including households). Result 4: Detection of the mechanism of standardisation as a method of solving the problem of adaptation of methodological and methodical techniques of economic analysis to the activities of different economic entities, and a system of principles of standardisation of the analysis of economic entities. The author also considered the normative legal bases of standardisation of economic analysis in the Russian Federation. The author presented the model of system standardisation analysis activities of an economic entity that includes multiple contours, providing backwards and forward linkages between economic subject and interested in the analytical side of information in the process of formation and implementation of standards of evaluation.

Conclusion. The development of the phenomenology of economic analysis is associated with the formation and improvement of the system of standardization of the analysis of economic entities that 1) meets the conditions of digitalization and innovation, 2) opens up great opportunities to improve the quality of economic entities, regardless of the specific scope of application of the results of analytical research.

1. Sokolova N. L. Digital culture or culture in the digital age? Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kultury. 2012;3(8):6–10. (In Russ.).

2. Gasilin A. V. Minimalism as a digital culture. Filosofiya i obshhestvo. 2017;4(85):83–95. (In Russ.).

3. Gnatyshina E. V. Socio-cultural approach as a general scientific basis for the formation of digital culture of the future teacher. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2018;(1):50–58. (In Russ.).

4. Kovalenko B., Gevorgian T. Digital culture: The embodiment of new business models. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo. 2018;4(93):91–93. (In Russ.).

5. Lisenkov A. A., Melnikova A. I. Digital media as a mirror of modern culture. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Mezhdunarodny`j nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal. 2018;(1):17. (In Russ.).

6. Mitrovich-Maria Ya. Grapheme and pixel: The culture of reading in the digital age. Stephanos. 2018; 27(1):18–29. (In Russ.).

7. Prokudin D. E., Sokolov E. G. Digital culture vs analogue culture. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2013;17(4):83–91. (In Russ.).

8. Strizhakova O. V. Digital view of human physical culture. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitanie, obrazovanie, trenirovka. 2018;(2):11–14. (In Russ.).

9. Chernykh S. I. Children in a digital culture. Sibirskij uchitel. 2016; 3(106):23–25. (In Russ.).

10. Kuprynousky V. P., Yartsev D. I., Kharitonov A. A., Utkin N. A., Nikolaev D. E., Drozhzhinov V. I., Namiot D. E., Volokitin Y. I. Semantics, metadata and ontologies in applications for smart cities — new BSI standards. International Journal Of Open Information Technologies. 2017;5(6):94–108. (In Russ.).

11. Larionov G. V., Nikitin A. Y. Historical aspects of the development of the scientific organisation of production systems. Vestnik Astraxanskogo gosudarstvennogo texnicheskogo universiteta. 2017;(3):49–53. (In Russ.).

12. Okrepilov V. V., Androsenko N. In., Chudinovskikh I. V. Application of methods of Economics of quality in the management of development of innovative potential. MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie). 2017;8(4):706–717. (In Russ.).

13. Domnitcheva A. A. Quality system the tourism product as a basis for the standardisation development of recreational services in Russia. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo socialno-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2017;5(69):70–73. (In Russ.).

14. Andreeva L. V. Standardisation in the system of legal regulation of commercial activities. Aktualnye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2018;2(87):35–42. (In Russ.).

15. Naydenova I., Tagunova N. International interdisciplinary standardisation: From setting objectives to the formation of national standards of general education. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. 2017;2(5(44)):25–44. (In Russ.).

16. Yanchenko A. Yu., Androsenko N. I., Ivanova G. N. Modern mechanisms of standardisation to improve the environmental situation in the regions. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of the region. 2018;14(2):516–529. (In Russ.).

17. Panasyuk V. P., Romanova I. V. Modern tendencies of standardisation of quality of professional training. Chelovek i obrazovanie. 2012;(2):22–26. (In Russ.).

18. Varlamova L. N. Standardisation of document management as a tool for the formation and development of information societies. Vestnik RGGU. 2016;1(3):95–102. (In Russ.).

19. Samuel Famiyeh, Disraeli Asante-Darko, Amoako Kwarteng. Service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty in the banking sector: The moderating role of organizational culture. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2018;35(8):1546–1567.

20. Honda Ana Carolina, Bernardo, Vitor Zanetti, Gerolamo Mateus Cecilio, Davis Mark M. How Lean Six Sigma Principles Improve Hospital Performance. Quality Management Journal. 2018;25(2):70–82. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2018.1436349.

21. Aarti Singh, Sushil. Developing a conceptual framework of waste management in the organizational context. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2017;28(6):786–806.