Preview

The world of new economy

Advanced search

Decomposition Model for Intellectual Capital Assessment: Regional Perspective

https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2025-19-4-76-87

Abstract

The relevance of the topic is determined by the growing role of intellectual capital as a key factor in the sustainable development of territorial socio-economic systems under the circumstances of digitalization and increasing interconnection of socio-economic processes. The purpose of this article is to develop a modified hierarchical model of intellectual capital reflecting the complex cause-effect relationships between its components and socio-economic indicators. Methods of the research include bibliographic analysis, systematization of indicators from regulatory documents, and synthesis of cognitive models. Scientific novelty lies in the integration of cognitive activity types into the structure of intellectual capital, including creative and innovative activity as a link between self-development and innovation. The results of the study indicate that intellectual capital should be viewed not as an isolated resource, but as a dynamic system capable of shaping development trajectories of territorial socio-economic systems. Practical significance: the findings can be used in decision-making processes related to regional development and in assessing the effectiveness of program tools. The model is universally applicable for economic analysis at both meso- and macroeconomic levels. Prospects for further research involve applied testing of the model in specific regions and refinement of the indicator set for different types of territorial socio-economic systems.

About the Author

O. V. Nedoluzhko
Vladivostok State University
Russian Federation

Olga V. Nedoluzhko — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Management 

Vladivostok 



References

1. Baklanov P. Ya. Structuring of territorial socio-economic systems. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya = Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5: Geography. 2013;(6):3–8. (In Russ.).

2. Arivazhagan D., Appal A.G., Gupta S.K. An assessment of challenges of digitalization of agrarian sector. In: Digitalisation: Opportunities and challenges for business (ICBT 2022). Cham: Springer. 2023:48–57. (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 621). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-26956-1_5

3. Bruneckiene J., Pekarskiene I., Palekiene O., Simanaviciene Z. An assessment of socio-economic systems’ resilience to economic shocks: The case of Lithuanian regions. Sustainability. 2019;11(3):566. DOI: 10.3390/su11030566

4. Swianiewicz P., Gendzwill A., Zardi A. Territorial reforms in Europe: Does size matter? Territorial Amalgamation Toolkit. Strasbourg: Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform, Council of Europe; 2017:122 p. URL: https://rm.coe.int/territorial-reforms-in-europe-does-size-matter-territorial-amalgamatio/168076cf16 (accessed on 05.05.2025).

5. Zagorsky V., Rahimov F., Horbova N., et al. Socio-economic aspect of territorial organization of power. Economic Affairs. 2023;68(3):1555–1564. DOI: 10.46852/0424-2513.3.2023.22

6. Kuyantseva I. I., Kuyantseva M. I. Measurement of the intellectual capital in the region (as example — Rostov region). Terra Economicus. 2011;9(3–3):123–126. (In Russ.).

7. Zhuckovskaya I.F., Orlov I.A. About need of the assessment of the role of intellectual capital for ensuring efficiency of reproduction of regional social and economic systems. Mnogourovnevoe obshchestvennoe vosproizvodstvo: voprosy teorii i praktiki = Multilevel Social Reproduction: Questions of Theory and Practice. 2015;(9):153–173. (In Russ.).

8. Akerman E.N. Special features of regional policy organization on the principles of co-evolution. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal. 2010;(330):115–120. (In Russ.).

9. Voron’ko E. N. The role of co-evolution of educational services and innovations in regional development. In: Sustainable economic development: International and national aspects. Proc. 2nd Int. sci.-pract. conference dedicated to the 50th anniversary of Polotsk State University (June 7–8, 2018). Novopolotsk: Polotsk State University; 2018:166–171. (In Russ.).

10. Burzalova A.A. Synergistic modeling of social-natural systems coevolution (on the example of the Baikal region). Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = The Buryat State University Bulletin. 2014;(14–2):22–26. (In Russ.).

11. Kudryashev A.F. Development, evolution, co-evolution: Conceptual correlation. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Bashkir University. 2012;17(1–1):640–644. (In Russ.).

12. Vertinova A.A. Adaptive mechanism of co-development of a university and a region as an ecosystem. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Vladivostok: Vladivostok State University; 2021. 180 p. (In Russ.)

13. Lijadi A.A. Theoretical foundations to outline human well-being: Meta-analytic literature review for defining empowered life years. IIASA Working Paper. 2018;(002). URL: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/15119/1/WP-18–002.pdf (accessed on 03.03.2025).

14. Prakash M., Teksoz K., Espey J., et al. Achieving a sustainable urban America. The U.S. Cities Sustainable Development Goals Index. New York, NY: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2017. 46 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25012.09601

15. Ivanova V. Yu. On the issue of modeling intellectual capital assessment at the regional level. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov vuzov Rossii “Problemy ekonomiki, finansov i upravleniya proizvodstvom”. 2013;(34):115–119. (In Russ.).

16. Mashkina D.I. Approach to evaluating the efficiency of the regional market of intellectual capital. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2017;5(12):201–206. (In Russ.).

17. Andriessen D.G., Stam C.D. Intellectual capital of the European Union 2008: Measuring the Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. 2009;7(4):489–500.

18. Chub A.A., Makarov P. Yu. Intellectual capital as a factor of Russian regions’ sustainable development. Strategii biznesa = Business Strategies. 2015;(6):24–32. (In Russ.)

19. Maltseva A. A. The role of intellectual capital in the regional development: The review of modern researches results. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Herald of Tver State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2018;(1):242–250. (In Russ.).

20. Aleksandrov I.N., Fedorova M. Yu. Assessment of intellectual capital in regions and territories. In: Strategic management of organizations: Modern technologies. Proc. sci.-pract. conf. (April 20–21, 2017). St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2017:308–312. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=29130473 (accessed on 31.01.2018). (In Russ.).

21. Saktoev V.E., Khaltaeva S.R., Tsyrenova A.A. Estimation of intellectual capital as a basis of management. Vestnik VSGUTU = ESSUTM Bulletin. 2018;(1):80–87. (In Russ.).

22. Shakhovskaya L.S., Kiryanova A. Yu. Assessment of the intellectual capital of the region. Regional’naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii = Regional Economy. The South of Russia. 2015;(3):36–43. (In Russ.).

23. Smetanina T.V., Zhikina O.V. Degree of development of the sovereign territory specified by the real value of intellectual capital. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo = Business. Education. Law. 2015;(3):75–82. (In Russ.).

24. Rudaeva O.I. Intellectual capital of nations: Measurement approaches. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2011;(10):150–156. (In Russ.).

25. Ostashchenko T.V., Dubina I. N. Assessment of regional intellectual capital and its correlation with the level of economic development of the Altai region and the Siberian Federal District. Ekonomika. Professiya. Biznes = Economics. Profession. Business. 2020;(4):98–107. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14258/epb2019106

26. Pavlov Yu.V., Khmeleva G. A. Assessing the impact of agglomeration effects on the economic development of Samara region’s urban districts. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo = Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2022;12(10):2773–2794. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/epp.12.10.116416

27. Zavalin G.S., Nedoluzhko O.V., Solodukhin K.S. Formation of the causal field of indicators for an organization’s intellectual capital development: A concept and a fuzzy economic and mathematical model. Biznes-informatika = Business Informatics. 2023;17(3):53–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/2587–814X.2023.3.53.69


Review

For citations:


Nedoluzhko O.V. Decomposition Model for Intellectual Capital Assessment: Regional Perspective. The world of new economy. 2025;19(4):76-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2025-19-4-76-87

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-6469 (Print)
ISSN 2220-7872 (Online)