Modeling the Management of Patent Activity of Economic Entities
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2024-18-1-116-125
Abstract
Ratings of the inventive patent activity of researchers in the Republic of Belarus indicate the need to significantly increase the number of filed and registered patents in national and foreign authorities. In this regard, it is necessary to create mechanisms for managing the patent activity of business entities as the foundation for the innovative development of the country’s national economy. In this article, the authors identify specific steps to link the management of patent activity with the strategic goals of the entire economic entity. This allows you to experience real economic benefits and make the process of increasing patent activity economically justified. A strategic map for managing the patent activity of an economic entity is proposed as a model. Each goal is associated with indicators that measure the degree of its achievement and determine development prospects. The main stages of creating such a control system are considered.
About the Authors
A. V. Gulay
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus
Belarus
Anatoli V. Gulay, Cand. Sci. (Techn.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department
Department of Intelligent and mechatronic systems
Minsk
A. I. Gourko
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus
Belarus
Alexandre I. Gourko, Cand. Sci. (Techn.), Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering; Department of Engineering Economics
Minsk
T. A. Sakhnovich
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus
Belarus
Tatyana A. Sakhnovich, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Department
Department of Mechanical Engineering; Department of Engineering Economics
Minsk
S. V. Yudina
Kazan National Technical University named after A.N.Tupolev — KAI
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Yudina, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof.
Department of E&UR
Kazan
References
1. Vityaz P., Nechepurenko Yu. National intellectual property management system. Nauka i innovatsii = The Science and Innovations. 2020;(4):4–13. (In Russ.).
2. Dyachenko O., Tuzova S., Ishchenko A. A. Patenting activity support: Foreign experience. Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost’ = Intellectual Property. Industrial Property. 2022;(5):3–20 (In Russ.).
3. Mia Shuk Chun Lam. The granting of intellectual property rights and their effect on the promotion of future innovation and creativity. The King’s Student Law Review. 2015;6(1):1–12. URL: https://blogs.kcl.ac.uk/kslr/wp-content/blogs.dir/86/files/2015/05/Mia-Shuk-Chun-Lam.pdf
4. Aghion P., Cai J., Dewatripont M., Du L., Harrison A., Legros P. Industrial policy and competition. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2015;7(4):1–32. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20120103
5. O’Connor S. M. Distinguishing different kinds of property in patents and copyrights. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3565272
6. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1996. 336 p. (Russ. ed.: Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelei. Ot strategii k deistviyu. Moscow: Olymp-Business; 2003. 216 p.).
Review
For citations:
Gulay A.V., Gourko A.I., Sakhnovich T.A., Yudina S.V. Modeling the Management of Patent Activity of Economic Entities. The world of new economy. 2024;18(1):116-125. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2024-18-1-116-125
Views:
204
Email this article 