Identification оf World Class Universities: Destructive Pluralism
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-3-6-19
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of identifying world-class universities (WCU) on the basis of information provided by various ranking systems. The relevance of the problem is due to the fact that in 2022 Russia was “cut off” from the world community, including the interruption of cooperation with leading international ranking universities, so the country risks losing the opportunity to self-check its successes and failures by generally recognized criteria. In this regard, the purpose of this article is hypothesis verifcation that the “friendly” ranking of ARWU base can serve as an effective substitute for the “unfriendly” QS ranking base. To test the formulated hypothesis, we used the previously developed algorithm for identifying WCU using statistical data from the fve Global University Rankings — Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), Times Higher Education (THE), Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Center for World University Rankings (CWUR) and National Taiwan University Ranking (NTU) — and two University Rankings by subject — QS and ARWU. Conducted calculations disproved the general hypothesis and revealed a fundamental inconsistency of results obtained on the basis of different rankings. In addition, by the example of the ARWU, a profound contradiction in the logic of compiling the GUR and the SRU was uncovered. That raises a broader question about adequacy of the concept of the WCU itself. To answer this question, we conducted a “humanitarian test” for the validity of modern WCU, which showed the presence of elementary illiteracy and lack of culture among graduates of advanced universities. Collected stylized examples allowed to establish that modern world market leaders’ universities do not pass the “humanitarian test”, and therefore the entire rating system cannot be considered a reliable basis for conclusions about the activities of universities. The question of replacing the term WCU with a less pretentious “product” category — practice-oriented universities — is being discussed.
About the Authors
E. V. Balatsky
RAS Central Economics and Mathematics Institute; Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Balatsky — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Director of the Center for Macroeconomic Research, Chief Researcher
Moscow
N. A. Ekimova
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Ekimova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Leading Researcher at the Center for Macroeconomic Research
Moscow
References
1. Hazelkorn E. Rankings and the reshape of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. 259 p. DOI: 10/1057/9780230306394
2. Liu N.C., Cheng Y. The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe. 2005;30(2):127–136. DOI: 10.1080/03797720500260116
3. Wang Q., Cheng Y., Liu N.C., eds. Building world-class universities. Different approaches to a shared goal. Rotterdam: SensePublishers; 2013. 230 p. DOI: 10.1007/978–94–6209–034–7
4. Turner D.A. World class universities and international rankings. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 2013;13(2):1–10. DOI: 10.3354/esep00132
5. Olcay G. A., Bulu M. Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;123:153–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.029
6. Harvey L. Rankings of higher education institutions: A critical review. Quality in Higher Education. 2008;14(3):187–207. DOI: 10.1080/13538320802507711
7. Frenken K., Heimeriks G.J., Hoekman J. What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden ranking data. Journal of Informetrics. 2017;11(3):859–872. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.006
8. Pavel A.-P. Global university rankings — A comparative analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;26:54–63. DOI: 10.1016/S 2212–5671(15)00838–2
9. Usher A., Savino M. A global survey of university league tables. Higher Education in Europe. 2007;32(1):5–15. DOI: 10.1080/03797720701618831
10. Bar-Ilan J., Levene M., Lin A. Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics. 2007;1(1):26–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2006.08.001
11. Aguillo I.F., Bar-Ilan J., Levene M., Ortega J.L. Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics. 2010;85(1):243–256. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–010–0190-z
12. Huang M.X. The comparison of performance ranking of scientifc papers for world universities and other ranking systems. Evaluation Bimonthly. 2011;(29):53–59.
13. Khosrowjerdi M., Kashani Z.S. Asian top universities in six world university ranking systems. Webology. 2013;10(2):1–9. URL: http://www.webology.org/2013/v10n2/a114.pdf (accessed on 16.05.2022).
14. Shehatta I., Mahmood K. Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: Policy implications. Scientometrics. 2016;109(2):1231–1254. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–016–2065–4
15. Soh K. What the overall doesn’t tell about world university rankings: Examples from ARWU, QSWUR, and THEWUR in 2013. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2015;37(3):295–307. DOI:10.1080/1360080X.2015.1035523
16. Moed H.F. A critical comparative analysis of fve world university rankings. Scientometrics. 2017;110(2):967– 990. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–016–2212-y
17. Chen K., Liao P. A comparative study on world university rankings: A bibliometric survey. Scientometrics. 2012;92(1):89–103. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–012–0724–7
18. Buela-Casal G., Gutiérrez-Martínez O., Bermúdez-Sánchez M.P., Vadillo-Muñoz O. Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics. 2007;71(3):349–365. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–007–1653–8
19. Salmi J., Frumin I. D. Excellence initiatives to establish world-class universities: Evaluation of recent experiences. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2013;(1):25–68. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2013–1–25–68
20. Salmi J. The challenge of establishing world-class universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2009. 136 p. (Russ. ed.: Salmi J. Sozdanie universitetov mirovogo klassa. Moscow: Ves’ Mir; 2009. 132 p.).
21. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Geopolitical meridians of world-class universities. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019;89(5):468–477. DOI: 10.1134/S 1019331619050022 (In Russ.: Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2019;89(10):1012–1023. DOI: 10.31857/S 0869–587389101012–1023).
22. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Identifcation оf world class universities. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2017;(3):81–89. (In Russ.).
23. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business; 2013. 544 p. (Russ. ed.: Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nishchety. Moscow: AST; 2015. 720 p.).
24. Van Raan A.F.J. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics. 2005;62(1):133–143. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–005–0008–6
Review
For citations:
Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Identification оf World Class Universities: Destructive Pluralism. The world of new economy. 2022;16(3):6-19. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-3-6-19
Views:
362
Email this article 