Business Processes Modelling of Crowdinvesting Platforms Based on Assets’ Tokenization
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-1-45-61
Abstract
The rapid development of digital platforms, the formation of new business models of interaction between the economics agents, as well as the problem of increasing the efficiency of resources have generated the need to develop new approaches to the exchange of resources using modern digitalization opportunities. The purpose of our study is to develop models of business processes for the exchange of financial resources on crowdinvesting platforms using tokenization. The research subject is the economic relations between transactions on crowdinvesting platforms participants. The authors proposed a typology of business processes of crowdinvesting platforms, taking into account the type of transaction scenario (credit (closed) and speculative (opened)), which allows grouping the processes of exchange of financial assets allocated by the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance. In addition, traditional models of financial assets exchange on a crowdinvesting platform are described. We proposed models of the exchange of financial assets on a crowdinvesting platform considering the tokenization process. Also, we substantiated that the tokenization will significantly increase the liquidity of over-the-counter securities, shares of non-public joint-stock companies, investments in real estate construction projects. The theoretical significance of the results obtained lies in expanding the theoretical and methodological basis for the development of the sharing economy in the financial area. The practical relevance of the proposed model is in the possibility of its application in improving the processes of exchanging financial resources on crowdinvesting platforms.
About the Authors
E. V. PopovRussian Federation
Evgeny V. Popov — D. Sc. (Econ.), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, The chief of the Center for Social and Economic Research and Expertise
Ekaterinburg
A. Y. Veretennikova
Russian Federation
Anna Y. Veretennikova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher
Ekaterinburg
S. A. Fedoreev
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Fedoreev — Cand. Sci. (Technical Sciences), Head of the Representative Office
Nizhny Tagil
References
1. Hesse M., Dann D., Braesemann F., Teubner T. Understanding the platform economy: Signals, trust, and social interaction. In: Proc.53rd Hawaii Int. conf. on system sciences (HICSS). (Maui, HI, January 7–10, 2020). Honolulu, HI: HICSS; 2020:5139–5148. URL: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/64373/0508.pdf
2. Dann D., Hawlitschek F., Peukert C., Martin C., Weinhardt C. Blockchain and trust in the platform economy: The case of peer-to-peer sharing. In: Proc. 15th Int. conf. on Wirtschaftsinformatik (Potsdam, March 08–11, 2020). Karlsruhe: Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik und Marketing; 2020:1459–1473. URL: https://library. gito.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N 2_manuscript_camera_ready.pdf
3. Fedulova E., Emokhonova Yu. Organizational forms of collective investment of direct investments: Problems and prospects of development. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School. 2015;(4):81–84. (In Russ.).
4. Volokitina V.M., Gedich T.G. The current state and development of the Russian coal industry: Analysis of investment component. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2017;16(7):1260–1268. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ea.16.7.1260
5. Kumar R., Sharma A.K., Tewari P.C. Thermal performance and economic analysis of 210 MWe coal-fired power plant. Journal of Thermodynamics. 2014:52018. DOI: 10.1155/2014/520183
6. Sidorenko E. L., Shaydullina V. K., Kirakosyan S. A. Tokenization of coal industry: Economic and criminological risks. Ugol’. 2018;(12):54–58. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041–5790–2018–12–54–58
7. Pshenichnikov V.V. Formation of a new model of banking business in the context of digitalization of the economy: Prospects and threats, In: Babkin A.V., ed. Shaping the digital economy and industry: New challenges. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2018:249–272. (In Russ.).
8. Konobeevskaya I.M. Digital rights as a new object of civil rights, Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya Seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Economics. Management. Law. 2019;19(3):330–334. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18500/1994–2540–2019–19–3–330–334
9. Kornilov D.A., Zaitsev D.A., Kornilova E.V. Modern forms of crowdfunding and crowdselling, the analysis of the market of ICO. ITportal. 2017;(3):6. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-formykraudfandinga-i-kraudselinga-analitika-rynka-ico (In Russ.).
10. Ageev V.N., Vlasov A.V. Potential applications of digital financial assets. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2020;12(6):100–112. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075–1990–2020–6–100–112
11. Chod J., Trichakis N., Tsoukalas G., Aspegren H., Weber M. On the financing benefits of supply chain transparency and blockchain adoption. Management Science. 2020;66(10):4378–4396. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3434
12. Cong L., Li Y., Wang N. Tokenomics: Dynamic adoption and valuation. The Review of Financial Studies. 2021;34(3):1105–1155. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhaa089
13. Fatehi S., Wagner M.R. Crowdfunding via revenue-sharing contracts. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management. 2017;10(3–4):407–424. DOI: 10.1561/0200000071
14. Malinova K., Park A. Tokenomics: When tokens beat equity. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ ssrn.3286825
15. Chod J., Lyandres E. A theory of ICOs: Diversification, agency, and information asymmetry. Management Science. 2021;67(10):5969–5989. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3754
16. Li J., Mann W. Initial coin offering and platform building. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ ssrn.3088726
17. Bakos Y., Hałaburda H. The role of cryptographic tokens and ICOs in fostering platform adoption. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3207777
18. Fahlenbrach R., Frattaroli M. ICO investors. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management. 2021;35(1):1–59. DOI: 10.1007/s11408–020–00366–0
19. de Jong A., Roosenboom P., van der Kolk T. What determines success in initial coin offerings? SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3250035
20. Howell S.T., Niessner M., Yermack D. Initial coin offerings: Financing growth with cryptocurrency token sales. The Review of Financial Studies. 2020;33(9):3925–3974. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhz131
21. Cicchiello A., Leone D. Encouraging investment in SMEs through equity-based crowdfunding. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business. 2020;11(3):258–278. DOI: 10.1504/IJGSB.2020.10031681
22. Kuti M., Bedo Z., Geiszl D. Equity-based crowdfunding. Financial and Economic Review. 2017;16(4):187–200. DOI: 10.25201/FER.16.4.187200
23. Cinelli S. Real estate crowdfunding: 2015 and beyond. In: Start-Ups and SMEs: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2020:927–954. DOI: 10.4018/978–1–7998–1760–4.ch048
24. Garcia-Teruel R.-M., Simón-Moreno H. The digital tokenization of property rights. A comparative perspective. Computer Law & Security Review. 2021;41:105543. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105543
25. Sokolov I. N., Solokhin A.A., Fiyaksel E.A. Comparative analysis of the Russian equity crowdfunding platforms. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2017;(9):48–56. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Y., Fedoreev S.A. Business Processes Modelling of Crowdinvesting Platforms Based on Assets’ Tokenization. The world of new economy. 2022;16(1):45-61. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-1-45-61