Cognitive Competencies of Graduates in the Conditions of Formation of the Knowledge-Digital Economy
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-1-101-107
Abstract
The processes of globalisation and internalisation in the world community, the development of high technologies and new industries, the digitalisation of the economy lead to the need for training with a fundamentally new set of competencies to meet the needs of customer organisations. The article is devoted to the study of cognitive competencies as key components in the structure of a university graduate’s personality in the knowledge-digital economy, which is in demand in the labour market. The article deals with the trend of changing the educational paradigm, based on updating the methodology of the modern educational process, including through the integration of educational, research and innovation activities as a strategy for the development of the modern economy. The necessity of inclusion in the list of key competencies of graduates. The author also discusses the concept of “cognitive competence” formulated by leading scientists involved in the study of this problem. The article presents the author’s model and structure of cognitive competencies developed for University graduates in the new economy, which is a set of development of mental, physical, emotional and spiritual intelligence. The author paid special attention to the fundamentally new role of the teacher in the educational process, in which the student does not just receive information from the teacher, but learns the methodology of independent “production” of knowledge.
About the Author
N. О. Vasetskaya
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia O. Vasetskaya — Cand. Sci. (Math.-Phis.), doctoral student
St. Petersburg
References
1. Becker G.S. Human Capital. N.Y.: Columbia University Press; 1964.
2. Kondaurova I.A. Knowledge and human capital in the system of production factors of the new economy. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS. 2016:4:136–142. (In Russ.).
3. Vasetskaya N.O., Klochkov Yu. S. Integrated innovative scientific and educational structures as a tool for training professionals in the field of engineering and technical education. St. Petersburg: Publishing house “BMW and K»; 2017. (In Russ.).
4. Potanina O.V. Cognitive competence of future engineer: essence, structure, content. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2009;14(1):298–301. (In Russ.).
5. Zeer E.F., Pavlova A.M., Cimanuk E.E. Modernization of professional education: Competence approach. Moscow: MPSI; 2005. (In Russ.).
6. Gein A.G., Nekrasov V. P. Metacognitive Invariants as Psychological-Pedagogical Factors of Training. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2013;1(2):128–132.
7. Khutorskoy A.V. Design technology of key and subject competencies. Internet journal “Eidos”. 2005. URL: http://eidos.ru/journal/2005/1212.htm (accessed on 02.09.2019).
8. White R.W. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Pсychological review. 1959:66:297–333.
9. Gilev A.A. Main indicators of cognitive competences. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki». 2014;1:53–61. (In Russ.).
10. Hutmacher W. Key competencies for Europe. Report of the Symposium Berne, Switzerland 27–30 March 1996. Council for Cultural Co-operation (CDCC) a Secondary Education for Europe. Strasburg; 1997.
11. Panichev S.A. Mathematical structures as a basis for constructing natural science training courses. Obrazovanie i nauka. 2004:5(29):108–113. (In Russ.).
12. Boyatzis R.E. The competent manager: a model for effective performance. New York: Wiley; 1982.
13. Klimenko EI. Information and communication competence — the key concept of modern education. Molodoj uchenyj. 2015;22:816–818. (In Russ.).
14. Roos TG. Die Arbeitswelt im Jahre 2020: Was bedeutet sie für die Bildung. Leicht geändert für Thurgauer Zeitung; 18 Juni, 2002.
15. Savignon S.J. Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. NewYork: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
16. Foresight 2025: transforming undergraduate programs, the Stanford University experience. URL: https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs/F_1516133873/Transformaciya.bakalavrskikh.programmOpyt.Stenfordskogo. universiteta.pdf. (аccessed on 15.09.2019). (In Russ.).
17. Lyubimova N.N., Neskriabina O.F. Harmonious development of personality: methodological aspects and value dimension. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2013;6. URL: http://science-education.ru/ ru/article/view?id=11735. (аccessed on 15.09.2019). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Vasetskaya N.О. Cognitive Competencies of Graduates in the Conditions of Formation of the Knowledge-Digital Economy. The world of new economy. 2020;14(1):101-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-1-101-107
Views:
671
Email this article 