BRICS Summits: A Discussion Club or Generator of Ideas of Social and Economic Development?
https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-3-29-38
Abstract
The survey objective is to analyse the implementation of BRICS summits decisions and to identify emerging problems. It was carried out using the deductive method as well as the methods of comparative analysis, expert assessments, historical analogies. Support of the WTO, cooperation development in the areas of energy, transport, agriculture, environmental protection, culture, innovative processes stimulation, the global financial security strengthening are traditionally in the focus of summits’ attention. The new cooperation area is the enjoyment of opportunities associated with the use of information and communication technologies. However, the practice of implementing decisions taken is too bureaucratic, and the assessment of its effectiveness is formalised due to the lack of reliable business contacts between research teams, schools of thought or universities. Even with the allocation of funds for a specific task, it is difficult to find a team to complete it effectively. Therefore, even a clearly defined mechanism does not ensure the objective to be implemented, and consultations and meetings held at the working groups level are reduced to an exchange of views. It is essential to name in the BRICS documents specific organisations responsible for the implementation of decisions. It is advisable to advise national news agencies to enhance coverage of the BRICS partnership.
About the Authors
V. V. Perskaya
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria V. Perskaya — Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honored Economist of the Russian Federation, Director, Institute for Research of International Economic Relations
Moscow
N. S. Revenko
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay S. Revenko — Ph.D. of Political Sciences, Lead Researcher, Institute for Research of International Economic Relations
Moscow
References
1. Van Noort C. Study of strategic narratives: The case of the BRICS. Politics and Governance. 2017;5(3):121–129.
2. Miskimmon A., O’Loughlin B., Roselle L. Strategic narratives: Communication power and new world order. New York: Rutledge; 2013. 224 p.
3. Shenhav S. Political narratives and political reality. International Political Science Review. 2006;27(3):245–262.
4. Nye J. Soft power. Foreign Policy. 1990;80:153–171.
5. International Economic Relations; Realities, Challenges and Prospects. Revenko L. S., ed. Moscow: MGIMO-University; 2019. 750 p. (In Russ.).
6. Revenko N. S. Digital economy of China: The new stage of the country’s economic development. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo. 2017;4–5:43–50. (In Russ.).
7. Revenko L. S., Revenko N. S. Global Trends and National Specifics of the Development of a Digital Economy. Record of the United States, India, China and the EU. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2017;15(4):20–39. (In Russ.).
8. International economic relations: Diversity of opinions in the era of change. Revenko L. S., ed. Moscow: MGIMO-University; 2017. 608 p. (In Russ.).
9. Popova I. M. Brazil’s 2019 BRICS Presidency: What to expect from the start of a New Decade of Cooperation and the J. Bolsonaro’s Administration. Vestnik RUDN. Mezhdonarodnye otnosheniia. 2018;18(4):925–941. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Perskaya V.V., Revenko N.S. BRICS Summits: A Discussion Club or Generator of Ideas of Social and Economic Development? The world of new economy. 2019;13(3):29-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-3-29-38
Views:
638
Email this article 