Preview

The world of new economy

Advanced search

Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration

https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2018-12-4-6-19

Abstract

The question of Eurasian integration is of great interest to politicians and academics for many reasons. First, it is the only existing and developing integration association in the former Soviet Union. Second, this association is valid in the neighbourhood of the European Union. Thirdly, this association is close to the sphere of important trade and investment interests of China. And finally, it is important that the EAEU was formed after 2014 — the beginning of the “sanctions” period in the life of Russia and the world. Integration in the Eurasian space is a unique case when previously closely interconnected countries within the framework of the central planning system, having survived the collapse of the former economic reality and still being in a protracted transformation process, restore their economic ties in a new market environment. In the case of the CIS, reintegration has not developed for some political reasons, despite available economic conditions. In addition to the analysis of macroeconomic and institutional parameters of the countries, the article presents the results of the classification of the regions of four EAEU countries: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. To optimise the cross-country comparison, we simplified the classification by the peculiarities of the administrative division of other EAEU members.

About the Authors

L.  M.  Grigor’ev
HSE; Analytical centre under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Head of the HSE Department of the World Economy; chief adviser to the Head of the Analytical centre under the Government of the Russian Federation

Moscow



V. V. Brilliantova
Analytical centre under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

research fellow, Department of research and development

Moscow



V. A. Pavlyushina
HSE Banking Institute; Analytical centre under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

research intern; Deputy head of the Research Department

Moscow



References

1. Glaz’ev S. Yu., Chushkin V. I., Tkachuk S. P. The European Union and the Eurasian Economic Community: similarities and differences in the processes of integration. Moscow: OOO «VIKOR MEDIA; 2013. (In Russ.).

2. Suzdal’tsev A. I. Post-Soviet space: unity and diversity. Rossiya i mir. Novaya epokha. 2008;(12):384–410. (In Russ.).

3. Kosikova L. S. Integration projects of Russia in the post-Soviet space: ideas and practice. Moscow: RAN, Institut ekonomiki, Otdelenie mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh i politicheskikh issledovanii; 2008. (In Russ.).

4. Libman A. Economic integration in the post-Soviet space: institutional aspect. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2005;(3):142–156. (In Russ.).

5. Grigor’ev L., Kondrat’ev S., Salikhov M. Difficult way out of the transformational crisis. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2008;(10):77–95. (In Russ.).

6. Knobel’ A. Eurasian Economic Union: development prospects and possible obstacles. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2015;(3):87–108. (In Russ.).

7. Krotov M. I., Muntiyan V. I. Eurasian Economic Union: history, features, prospects. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2015;11(83):33–47. (In Russ.).

8. Bykov A. N. Eurasian integration, its prospects and opportunities. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal. 2014;(1):24–39. (In Russ.).

9. Batsaikhan U., Dabrowski M. Central Asia — twenty-five years after the breakup of the USSR. Russian Journal of Economics.2017;3(3):296–320.

10. Zhang X., Li L., Gabuev A. Competition or coordination? The Eurasian Economic Union and China’s one belt, one road initiative. Russian Analytical Digest (RAD). 2016;183.

11. Dutkiewicz P., Sakwa R. and Lukyanov F., eds. Eurasia on the Edge: Managing Complexity. URL: https://carleton.ca/eurus/wp-content/uploads/Eurasia-on-the-Edge.pdf.

12. Vinokurov E. Eurasian Economic Union: Current state and preliminary results. Russian Journal of Economics. 2017;3(1):54–70.

13. Galimov D. I. et al. Cross-sectoral effects of Russia’s trade integration in the EAEU. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2017;(10):123–139. (In Russ.).

14. Lagutina M. L. The EU and the EAEU: problems and prospects of cooperation in the current geopolitical realities. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2015;11(83):124–136. (In Russ.).

15. Zeleneva I. V., Kontsova E. A. ASEAN and the Eurasian Economic Union: problems and prospects of cooperation. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2015;11(83):112–123. (In Russ.).

16. Skriba A. S. Pairing the EAEU and the Silk Road economic belt: the interests of the participants and the challenges of implementation. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika. 2016; 11(3):67–81. (In Russ.).

17. Lapenko M. V. The external outline of the EAEU: potential for expansion and search for optimal mechanisms of interaction. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2016;16(1):71–76. (In Russ.).

18. Wolczuk K., Dragneva R. The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. Chatham House; 2017.

19. Tabakh A. V., Podrugina A. V. Supranational mega-regulation: foreign experience and prospects of the EAEU. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika. 2015;(4):122–143. (In Russ.).

20. Loginov E. L., Bortalevich S. I. Oil and gas markets of Russia and EAEU: ways of development in the conditions of macroeconomic instability. Monographs. Moscow: Market Economy Institute of RAS; 2016. (In Russ.).

21. Telegina E. A., Khalova G. O., Studenikina L. A. Energy integration in the EAEU: features and prospects (pp. 72–79). Moscow: IMEMO RAS; 2016. (In Russ.).

22. Topilin A. V. A common labour market and migration: new opportunities in the framework of the EAEU. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2015;(10):69–76. (In Russ.).

23. Bozhenko V. V. et al. The impact of differential integration on the remittance flows of labor migrants in the EAEU and the EU. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i pravo. 2014;(5):102–107. (In Russ.).

24. Butorina O. Features of the Eurasian model of economic integration. Sovremennaya Evropa. 2016;(2):28–32. (In Russ.).

25. Grigor’ev L.M., Pavlyushina V. A., Social inequality as a problem of Russia’s economic strategy. Mir novoi ekonomiki. 2017;(3):58–71. (In Russ.).

26. Grigor’ev L.M., Urozhaeva Yu.V., Ivanov D. S. Synthetic classification of regions: the basis of regional policy. In Russian regions: economic crisis and modernisation problems. L. M. Grigor’ev, N. V. Zubarevich, G. R. Khasaev, eds. Moscow: TEIS; 2011. (In Russ.).

27. Golyashev A. V., Grigor’ev L. M. Types of Russian regions: Stability and shifts in 2003–2013. Moscow: Analiticheskii tsentr, 2014. URL: http://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/4363.pdf. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Grigor’ev L.M., Brilliantova V.V., Pavlyushina V.A. Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration. The world of new economy. 2018;12(4):6-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2018-12-4-6-19

Views: 982


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-6469 (Print)
ISSN 2220-7872 (Online)