worldneweconomyМир новой экономикиThe world of new economy2220-64692220-7872Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation10.26794/2220-6469-2024-18-3-138-147worldneweconomy-453Research ArticleРЕАЛЬНЫЙ СЕКТОРREAL SECTORЭффективность применения преференциальных режимов в государственных закупках для субъектов малого предпринимательстваThe Efficiency of Applying Preferential Regimes for Small-Sized Businesses in Public ProcurementМатвеевЕ. О.MatveevE. O.

Евгений Олегович Матвеев — научный сотрудник лаборатории исследований бюджетной политики ИПЭИ РАНХиГС

Москва

Evgenii O. Matveev — Research Associate, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Moscow

РАНХиГСРоссияAcademy of National Economy and Public AdministrationRussian Federation202415112024183138147Copyright © Матвеев Е.О., 20242024Матвеев Е.О.Matveev E.O.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/453

В данном исследовании рассматривается вопрос эффективности применения преференциальных режимов в государственных закупках для субъектов малого предпринимательства (СМП) в России на примере оценки результатов от увеличения норматива обязательных закупок, создающего квазиэкспериментальные условия. Итоги статистического и эконометрического анализа подтверждают достаточно умеренный рост участия СМП в закупках после повышения норматива. При этом общий объем закупок у СМП остается существенно ниже норматива. Также выясняется, что экономия в закупках у СМП — выше, чем в прочих закупках, и данный эффект не снижается после увеличения норматива, что выгодно для государства. В этой связи требуется ужесточение контроля за исполнением норматива закупок у СМП, а также расширение применения лучших практик организации закупочных процедур.

This study examines the efficiency of preferential procurement regimes for small-sized businesses (SBs) in Russia, using the example of assessing the results of increased procurement standards. The results of statistical and econometric analysis show a rather moderate increase in SB participation in procurement after increasing the standard. At the same time, the overall volume of purchases from SBs remains significantly lower than the standard. It also turns out that savings on purchases from SBs are greater than on other purchases, and this effect persists after increasing the standard, benefiting the state. In this context, it is necessary to strengthen control over the implementation of procurement standards for SBs and to expand the use of best practices in procurement procedures.

государственные закупкисубъекты малого предпринимательстваСМПпреференциальный режимпрозрачностьконкуренцияpublic procurementgovernment purchasessmall-sized businesspreferential treatmenttransparencycompetitionСтатья подготовлена по результатам исследований, выполненных за счет бюджетных средств по государственному заданию Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации.The article is based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budgetary funds under the state assignment to the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.ReferencesLoader K. The challenge of competitive procurement: Value for money versus small business support. Public Money & Management. 2007;27(5):307–314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9302.2007.00601.xLoader K. The challenge of competitive procurement: Value for money versus small business support. Public Money & Management. 2007;27(5):307–314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9302.2007.00601.xMichaelis C., McGuire M., Ferguson L. SBS diversity in public sector procurement survey: Final report. Birmingham: Databuild Ltd; 2003. 50 p. URL: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20090609003228/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file38294.pdfMichaelis C., McGuire M., Ferguson L. SBS diversity in public sector procurement survey: Final report. Birmingham: Databuild Ltd; 2003. 50 p. URL: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20090609003228/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file38294.pdfWalker H., Preuss L. Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: Public sector perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2008;16(15):1600–1609. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014Walker H., Preuss L. Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: Public sector perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2008;16(15):1600–1609. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014Smith P., Hobbs A. SMEs and public sector procurement. Research report prepared for the Small Business Service. London: Shreeveport Management Consultancy; 2002.Smith P., Hobbs A. SMEs and public sector procurement. Research report prepared for the Small Business Service. London: Shreeveport Management Consultancy; 2002.Glover A. Accelerating the SME economic engine: Through transparent, simple and strategic procurement. London: HM Treasury; 2008. 76 p. URL: https://sites.telfer.uottawa.ca/womensenterprise/files/2014/06/Procurement-Glover-Review_Eng.pdfGlover A. Accelerating the SME economic engine: Through transparent, simple and strategic procurement. London: HM Treasury; 2008. 76 p. URL: https://sites.telfer.uottawa.ca/womensenterprise/files/2014/06/Procurement-Glover-Review_Eng.pdfUyarra E., Flanagan K. Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European Planning Studies. 2010;18(1):123–143. DOI: 10.1080/09654310903343567Uyarra E., Flanagan K. Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European Planning Studies. 2010;18(1):123–143. DOI: 10.1080/09654310903343567Erridge A., Fee R. Involvement of SMEs in public procurement. The Public Procurement Law Review. 1998;2:37–51.Erridge A., Fee R. Involvement of SMEs in public procurement. The Public Procurement Law Review. 1998;2:37–51.Erridge A., Hennigan S. Sustainable procurement in health and social care in Northern Ireland. Public Money & Management. 2012;32(5):363–370. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2012.703422Erridge A., Hennigan S. Sustainable procurement in health and social care in Northern Ireland. Public Money & Management. 2012;32(5):363–370. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2012.703422Pickernell D., Kay A., Packham G., Miller C. Competing agendas in public procurement: An empirical analysis of opportunities and limits in the UK for SMEs. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2011;29(4):641– 658. DOI: 10.1068/c10164bPickernell D., Kay A., Packham G., Miller C. Competing agendas in public procurement: An empirical analysis of opportunities and limits in the UK for SMEs. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2011;29(4):641– 658. DOI: 10.1068/c10164bLoader K. Supporting SMEs through government purchasing activity. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 2005;6(1):17–26. DOI: 10.5367/0000000053026383Loader K. Supporting SMEs through government purchasing activity. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 2005;6(1):17–26. DOI: 10.5367/0000000053026383Bovis C. Public procurement and small and medium-sized enterprises in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. London: Chartered Association of Certified Accountants; 1996.Bovis C. Public procurement and small and medium-sized enterprises in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. London: Chartered Association of Certified Accountants; 1996.Withey J.J. Small manufacturing businesses: Their interest in securing contracts from public agencies. Journal of Public Procurement. 2011;11(3):388–402. DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-11–03–2011-B004Withey J.J. Small manufacturing businesses: Their interest in securing contracts from public agencies. Journal of Public Procurement. 2011;11(3):388–402. DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-11–03–2011-B004Clark III M., Moutray C. The future of small businesses in the US federal government marketplace. Journal of Public Procurement. 2004;4(3):450–470. DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-04–03–2004-B006Clark III M., Moutray C. The future of small businesses in the US federal government marketplace. Journal of Public Procurement. 2004;4(3):450–470. DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-04–03–2004-B006Nakabayashi J. Small business set-asides in procurement auctions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Economics. 2013;100:28–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.01.003Nakabayashi J. Small business set-asides in procurement auctions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Economics. 2013;100:28–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.01.003Krasnokutskaya E., Seim K. Bid preference programs and participation in highway procurement auctions. American Economic Review. 2011;101(6):2653–2686. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2653Krasnokutskaya E., Seim K. Bid preference programs and participation in highway procurement auctions. American Economic Review. 2011;101(6):2653–2686. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2653Marion J. Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions. Journal of Public Economics. 2007;91(7–8):1591–1624. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.005Marion J. Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions. Journal of Public Economics. 2007;91(7–8):1591–1624. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.005Timmermans B., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J.M. Coordinated unbundling: A way to stimulate entrepreneurship through public procurement for innovation. Science and Public Policy. 2013;40(5):674–685. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct023Timmermans B., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J.M. Coordinated unbundling: A way to stimulate entrepreneurship through public procurement for innovation. Science and Public Policy. 2013;40(5):674–685. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct023Glas A.H., Eßig M. Factors that influence the success of small and medium-sized suppliers in public procurement: Evidence from a centralized agency in Germany. Supply Chain Management. 2018;23(1):65–78. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-09–2016–0334Glas A.H., Eßig M. Factors that influence the success of small and medium-sized suppliers in public procurement: Evidence from a centralized agency in Germany. Supply Chain Management. 2018;23(1):65–78. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-09–2016–0334Hoekman B., Taş B.K.O. Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing. Small Business Economics. 2022;58(1):383–402. DOI: 10.1007/s11187–020–00414-zHoekman B., Taş B.K.O. Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing. Small Business Economics. 2022;58(1):383–402. DOI: 10.1007/s11187–020–00414-zБелев С., Ветеринаров В., Матвеев Е. Фаворитизм в государственных закупках: оценка на данных по открытым конкурсам на НИОКР. Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2023;(2):36–63. DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2023_2_36–63Belev S., Veterinarov V., Matveev Е. Vertical collusion in public procurement: Estimation based on data for R&D composite auctions. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2023;(2):36–63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2023_2_36–63

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.