<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">worldneweconomy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Мир новой экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The world of new economy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2220-6469</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2220-7872</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/2220-6469-2024-18-3-63-72</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">worldneweconomy-447</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕОРИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMIC THEORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сдвиг парадигмы: заменит ли продуктивизм «вашингтонский консенсус»?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Paradigm Shift: Will “Productivism” Replace the Washington Consensus?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3766-2246</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Толкачев</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tolkachev</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сергей Александрович Толкачев — доктор экономических наук, профессор кафедры экономической теории</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sergey A. Tolkachev — Dr. Sci. (Econ.) Professor, Department of Economic Theory</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">satolkachev@fa.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Финансовый университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Financial University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Толкачев С.А., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Толкачев С.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tolkachev S.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/447">https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/447</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются причины появления и теоретическое содержание новой политико-экономической концепции «продуктивизм», претендующей на доктринальность и замещающей «неолиберализм» и «вашингтонский консенсус».</p><p>Показаны отличия продуктивизма от предыдущих консенсусных экономических доктрин, выявлены его внутренние противоречия, представлены основные критические замечания оппонентов. Несмотря на то что некоторые авторы рассматривают продуктивизм в качестве «новой экономики предложения», мы считаем, что трактовать данную концепцию следует не в русле экономических теорий (поскольку она не обладает соответствующими парадигмальными характеристиками), а в рамках семейства политико-экономических доктрин, нацеленных на непосредственное обоснование экономической политики. В данном случае продуктивизм «вливается» в американское семейство доктрин национального девелопментализма, имеющего длительную историю и острую востребованность в настоящий период.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article examines the reasons for the emergence and theoretical content of a new political-economic concept “productivism”, which claims to be doctrinal, replacing the neoliberalism and the “Washington Consensus”. The article explains how productivism differs from previous economic theories. It also highlights some internal contradictions within productivism and explains why some people criticize it. Despite the fact that some authors consider productivism as a “New Supply-Side Economics”, we propose to treat this concept not in the context of economic theories, as it does not have the relevant paradigmatic characteristics, but within the family of political-economic doctrines aimed at the direct justiﬁcation of economic policy. In this case, productivism joins the American collection of “national developmentalism” doctrines, which has a long history and acute demand in the present period.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>политико-экономическая доктрина</kwd><kwd>неолиберализм</kwd><kwd>экономическое развитие</kwd><kwd>байденомика</kwd><kwd>промышленная политика</kwd><kwd>производительность</kwd><kwd>протекционизм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>political-economic doctrine</kwd><kwd>neoliberalism</kwd><kwd>economic development</kwd><kwd>bidenomics</kwd><kwd>industrial policy</kwd><kwd>productivity</kwd><kwd>protectionism</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена по результатам исследований, выполненных за счет бюджетных средств по государственному заданию Финуниверситету.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The paper was prepared on the research results carried out at the expense of budgetary funds within the framework of the government research assignment to the Financial University.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodrik D. The new productivism paradigm? Project Syndicate. Jul. 05, 2022. URL: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/new-productivism-economic-policy-paradigm-by-dani-rodrik-2022–07</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodrik D. The new productivism paradigm? Project Syndicate. Jul. 05, 2022. URL: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/new-productivism-economic-policy-paradigm-by-dani-rodrik-2022–07</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodrik D. Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics; 1997. 128 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodrik D. Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics; 1997. 128 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Overbeek H., van Apeldoorn B., eds. Neoliberalism in crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. 268 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Overbeek H., van Apeldoorn B., eds. Neoliberalism in crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. 268 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Duménil G., Lévy D. The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2011. 391 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Duménil G., Lévy D. The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2011. 391 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Menand L. The rise and fall of neoliberalism. The New Yorker. Jul. 17, 2023. URL: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/07/24/the-rise-and-fall-of-neoliberalism</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Menand L. The rise and fall of neoliberalism. The New Yorker. Jul. 17, 2023. URL: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/07/24/the-rise-and-fall-of-neoliberalism</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saad-Filho A. Endgame: From crisis in neoliberalism to crises of neoliberalism. Human Geography. 2021;14(1):133–137. DOI: 10.1177/1942778620962026</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saad-Filho A. Endgame: From crisis in neoliberalism to crises of neoliberalism. Human Geography. 2021;14(1):133–137. DOI: 10.1177/1942778620962026</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reich R. Bringing industrial policy back. Nov. 20, 2023. URL: https://www.postneoliberalism.org/articles/robertreich-in-interview-bringing-industrial-policy-back-in/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reich R. Bringing industrial policy back. Nov. 20, 2023. URL: https://www.postneoliberalism.org/articles/robertreich-in-interview-bringing-industrial-policy-back-in/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stiglitz J. E. The road to freedom: Economics and the good society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton &amp; Company; 2024. 384 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stiglitz J. E. The road to freedom: Economics and the good society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton &amp; Company; 2024. 384 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Толкачев С.А. Промышленная политика и решоринг: байденомика сменяет трампономику. США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2022;(1):21–38. DOI: 10.31857/S2686673022010023</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tolkachev S.A. Industrial policy and reshoring: Bidenomics replaces trumponomics. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura = USA &amp; Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture. 2022;(1):21–38. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S2686673022010023</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodrik D. On productivism. March 2023. URL: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/ﬁles/dani-rodrik/ﬁles/on_productivism.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodrik D. On productivism. March 2023. URL: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/ﬁles/dani-rodrik/ﬁles/on_productivism.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodrik D. Is populism necessarily bad economics? AEA Papers and Proceedings. 2018;108:196–199. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20181122</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodrik D. Is populism necessarily bad economics? AEA Papers and Proceedings. 2018;108:196–199. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20181122</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis A. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. The Manchester School. 1954;22(2):139–191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9957.1954.tb00021.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis A. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. The Manchester School. 1954;22(2):139–191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9957.1954.tb00021.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Temin P. The vanishing middle class: Prejudice and power in a dual economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2017. 256 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Temin P. The vanishing middle class: Prejudice and power in a dual economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2017. 256 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferry J. Productivism is the key to national prosperity. Coalition for a Prosperous America. Apr. 15, 2024. URL: https://prosperousamerica.org/economic-view-productivism-is-the-key-to-national-prosperity/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferry J. Productivism is the key to national prosperity. Coalition for a Prosperous America. Apr. 15, 2024. URL: https://prosperousamerica.org/economic-view-productivism-is-the-key-to-national-prosperity/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galbraith J. K. A comment on Dani Rodrik’s “New paradigm for economic policy”. Nov. 21, 2023. URL: https://www.postneoliberalism.org/articles/a-comment-on-dani-rodriks-new-paradigm-for-economic-policy/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galbraith J. K. A comment on Dani Rodrik’s “New paradigm for economic policy”. Nov. 21, 2023. URL: https://www.postneoliberalism.org/articles/a-comment-on-dani-rodriks-new-paradigm-for-economic-policy/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Why Taiwan matters. Project Syndicate. Aug. 09, 2022. URL: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-taiwan-matters-pelosi-visit-by-daron-acemoglu-and-james-a-robinson-2022–08</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Why Taiwan matters. Project Syndicate. Aug. 09, 2022. URL: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-taiwan-matters-pelosi-visit-by-daron-acemoglu-and-james-a-robinson-2022–08</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mamoon D. Harvard University professor at the cross road of new economics: Economics of productivism. 2022. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362609059_Harvard_University_Professor_at_the_Cross_Road_of_New_Economics_Economics_of_Productivism</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mamoon D. Harvard University professor at the cross road of new economics: Economics of productivism. 2022. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362609059_Harvard_University_Professor_at_the_Cross_Road_of_New_Economics_Economics_of_Productivism</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Толкачев С. А. Глобализация и политическая экономия: в поисках новой конкурентной парадигмы. Капитал страны. 02.02.2011. URL: https://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/globalizaciya_i_politicheskaya_ekonomiya_v_poiskah_novoj_konkurentnoj_parad/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tolkachev S.A. Globalization and political economy: In search of a new competitive paradigm. Kapital strany. Feb. 02, 2011. URL: https://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/globalizaciya_i_politicheskaya_ekonomiya_v_poiskah_novoj_konkurentnoj_parad/ (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Atkinson R. D., Lind M. National developmentalism: From forgotten tradition to new consensus. American Affairs. 2019;3(2):165–191. URL: https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2019/05/national-developmentalism-from-forgotten-tradition-to-new-consensus/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Atkinson R. D., Lind M. National developmentalism: From forgotten tradition to new consensus. American Affairs. 2019;3(2):165–191. URL: https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2019/05/national-developmentalism-from-forgotten-tradition-to-new-consensus/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Atkinson R. D. National developmentalism: The alternative to neoliberalism and neo-new dealism. Information Technology&amp; Innovation Foundation. Jan. 22, 2024. URL: https://itif.org/publications/2024/01/22/nationaldevelopmentalism-the-alternative-to-neoliberalism-and-neo-new-dealism/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Atkinson R. D. National developmentalism: The alternative to neoliberalism and neo-new dealism. Information Technology&amp; Innovation Foundation. Jan. 22, 2024. URL: https://itif.org/publications/2024/01/22/nationaldevelopmentalism-the-alternative-to-neoliberalism-and-neo-new-dealism/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
