worldneweconomyМир новой экономикиThe world of new economy2220-64692220-7872Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-3-75-84worldneweconomy-365Research ArticleЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕОРИЯECONOMIC THEORYОценка значимости уровня и качества жизни населения в РоссииAssessment of the Signifcance of the Level and Quality of Life of the Population in Russiahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8069-6639БатаринИ. В.BatarinI. V.

 Иван Валентинович Батарин — аспирант кафедры экономики и управления предприятиями и производственными комплексами

Санкт-Петербург 

 Ivan V. Batarin — postgraduate student at the Faculty of Management, Department of Economics and Management of Enterprises and Industrial Complexes

St. Petersburg

ivanikys@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-8966АлиевИ. М.AlievI. M.

 Исмаил Магеррамович Алиев — доктор экономических наук, профессор кафедры экономики и управления предприятиями и производственными комплексами

Санкт-Петербург 

 Ismail M. Aliev — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Department of Economics and Management of Enterprises and Industrial Complexes

St. Petersburg

aliev.06@mail.ruСанкт-Петербургский государственный экономический университетРоссияSt. Petersburg State University of EconomicsRussian Federation2022131020221637584Copyright © Батарин И.В., Алиев И.М., 20222022Батарин И.В., Алиев И.М.Batarin I.V., Aliev I.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/365

Ввиду разных подходов к анализу и моделированию уровня и качества жизни населения у различных стран и международных интеграционных объединений для установления соответствующих методик в России необходимо выявить ее национальные особенности развития. В представленной статье анализируются наиболее существенные направления развития групп показателей уровня и качества жизни населения в Российской Федерации. При проведении исследования были применены системный подход и статистические методы. На основе нормативно-правовых актов и научных работ экспертов авторами выделены группы показателей качества жизни: «материальное благополучие», «здравоохранение», «образование», «окружение», «самочувствие», «власть». Проведен контент-анализ комментариев из открытой базы по вопросу представлений о «лучшей жизни». Выявлены наиболее и наименее выраженные группы предпочтений среди населения. Продемонстрированы отличия в мнениях россиян о важности групп показателей в зависимости от пола, возраста и в связи с пандемией. Сделан вывод о необходимости учета подобных переменных, обосновывается необходимость внесения изменений в действующие нормативы для перехода к новым моделям уровня и качества жизни.

It is necessary to identify the national features of development in Russia to establish appropriate methods, in view of the different approaches to the analysis and modelling of the standard of living and quality of life of the population in various countries and international integration associations. This article analyzes the practical aspects of the most signifcant areas of interaction and development groups of indicators of standard of living and quality of life in the Russian Federation. The study used a systematic approach and statistical methods. The groups of indicators of quality of life summarized by the author were compiled on the basis of normative legal acts and expert documents: material wellbeing, healthcare, education, environment, self-perception, power. The content analysis was conducted of open-source commentaries on the issue of representation of a “better life” to determine key problems and propensities. The most and least pronounced groups of preferences among the population are identifed. Differences in the opinions of Russians on the importance of groups of indicators depending on gender, age and in connection with the pandemic are demonstrated. The author has come to conclusion about necessity to take into account such variables, it is substantiated the need to make changes to the current standards for the transition to new models of the standard of living and quality of life

качество жизниуровень жизнипредпочтения гражданаспекты жизнедеятельностигруппы показателей качества жизниконтент-анализquality of lifestandard of livingcitizens’ preferencesaspects of livingquality of lifegroups of indicatorscontent analysisReferencesБатарин И.В. Стандарты и документы, регулирующие уровень и качество жизни населения в Российской Федерации. Научные исследования современных проблем развития России: Цифровая трансформация экономики. Сб. науч. тр. по итогам междунар. науч.-практ. конф. молодых ученых СПбГЭУ. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГЭУ; 2021:572–575.Batarin I.V. Standards and documents regulating the standard of living and quality of life in the Russian Federation. In: Research on contemporary problems of Russia’s development: Digital transformation of the economy. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. conf. of young scientists of St. Petersburg State University of Economics. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2021:572–575. (In Russ.).Ершов А.Н., Мишин В.А. Методики оценки уровня социального здоровья населения. Вестник экономики, права и социологии. 2021;(3):142–146.Ershov A.N., Mishin V.A. Methods for assessing the level of social health of the population. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii = The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology. 2021;(3):142–146. (In Russ.).Shynkaruk О., Denisova L. Methods for assessing quality of life: International experience. Physical Education, Sports and Health Culture in Modern Society. 2017;1(37):36–42. DOI: 10.29038/2220–7481–2017–01–36–42Shynkaruk О., Denisova L. Methods for assessing quality of life: International experience. Physical Education, Sports and Health Culture in Modern Society. 2017;1(37):36–42. DOI: 10.29038/2220–7481–2017–01–36–42Macků K., Caha J., Pászto V., Tuček P. Subjective or objective? How objective measures relate to subjective life satisfaction in Europe. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020;9(5):320. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9050320Macků K., Caha J., Pászto V., Tuček P. Subjective or objective? How objective measures relate to subjective life satisfaction in Europe. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020;9(5):320. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9050320Kubiszewski I., Zakariyya N., Costanza R. Objective and subjective indicators of life satisfaction in Australia: How well do people perceive what supports a good life? Ecological Economics. 2018;154:361–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.017Kubiszewski I., Zakariyya N., Costanza R. Objective and subjective indicators of life satisfaction in Australia: How well do people perceive what supports a good life? Ecological Economics. 2018;154:361–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.017Diener E., Oishi S., Tay L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour. 2018;2(4):253–260. DOI: 10.1038/s41562–018–0307–6Diener E., Oishi S., Tay L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour. 2018;2(4):253–260. DOI: 10.1038/s41562–018–0307–6Гринько Т.В., Филиппова Е.В. Обеспечение качества жизни населения в контексте национальной экономической безопасности. The Scientifc Heritage. 2019;(41–3):6–10.Grynko T., Filippova Ye. Ensuring the population’s quality of life in the context of national economic security. The Scientifc Heritage. 2019;(41–3):6–10.Dereli D.D. The relationship between high-technology exports, patent and economic growth in Turkey (1990–2015). Journal of Business, Economics and Finance. 2019;8(3):173–180. DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1124Dereli D.D. The relationship between high-technology exports, patent and economic growth in Turkey (1990–2015). Journal of Business, Economics and Finance. 2019;8(3):173–180. DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1124Li X., Chen H., Zhu Z. Exploring the relationship between life quality and the perceptions of living-environment crises. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):774. DOI: 10.1186/s12889–021–10861–2Li X., Chen H., Zhu Z. Exploring the relationship between life quality and the perceptions of living-environment crises. BMC Public Health, 2021;21(1):774. DOI: 10.1186/s12889–021–10861–2Rogge N., Van Nijverseel I. Quality of life in the European Union: A multidimensional analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2019;141(2):765–789. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–018–1854-yRogge N., Van Nijverseel I. Quality of life in the European Union: A multidimensional analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2019;141(2):765–789. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–018–1854-yAbokyi E., Strijker D., Asiedu K.F., Daams M.N. Buffer stock operations and well-being: The case of smallholder farmers in Ghana. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2022;23(1):125–148. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–021–00391–4Abokyi E., Strijker D., Asiedu K.F., Daams M.N. Buffer stock operations and well-being: The case of smallholder farmers in Ghana. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2022;23(1):125–148. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–021–00391–4Voukelatou V., Gabrielli L., Miliou I., Cresci S, Sharma R, Tesconi M., Pappalardo L. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics. 2021;11(4):279–309. DOI: 10.1007/s41060–020–00224–2Voukelatou V., Gabrielli L., Miliou I., Cresci S, Sharma R, Tesconi M., Pappalardo L. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics. 2021;11(4):279–309. DOI: 10.1007/s41060–020–00224–2Pleeging E., Burger M., Van Exel J. The relations between hope and subjective well-being: A literature overview and empirical analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2021;16(2):1019–1041. DOI: 10.1007/s11482–019–09802–4Pleeging E., Burger M., Van Exel J. The relations between hope and subjective well-being: A literature overview and empirical analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2021;16(2):1019–1041. DOI: 10.1007/s11482–019–09802–4Rani A., Quddoos A., Yaseen M.R., Tabassum S., Asif. A. The impact of social capital on household well-being in Pakistan. Social Indicators Research. 2021;158(3):927–946. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–021–02717–4Rani A., Quddoos A., Yaseen M.R., Tabassum S., Asif. A. The impact of social capital on household well-being in Pakistan. Social Indicators Research. 2021;158(3):927–946. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–021–02717–4Greyling T., Tregenna F. Quality of life: Validation of an instrument and analysis of relationships between domains. Development Southern Africa. 2020;37(1):19–39. DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2019.1684243Greyling T., Tregenna F. Quality of life: Validation of an instrument and analysis of relationships between domains. Development Southern Africa. 2020;37(1):19–39. DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2019.1684243Burckhardt M., Fleischer S., Berg A. Agreement between the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) interview and a paper-administered adaption. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2020;20:80. DOI: 10.1186/s12874–020–00961–9Burckhardt M., Fleischer S., Berg A. Agreement between the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) interview and a paper-administered adaption. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2020;20:80. DOI: 10.1186/s12874–020–00961–9Rohrer J.M., Schmukle S.C. Individual importance weighting of domain satisfaction ratings does not increase validity. Collabra: Psychology. 2018;4(1):6. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.116Rohrer J.M., Schmukle S.C. Individual importance weighting of domain satisfaction ratings does not increase validity. Collabra: Psychology. 2018;4(1):6. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.116Faka A. Assessing quality of life inequalities. A geographical approach. ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation. 2020;9(10):600. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9100600Faka A. Assessing quality of life inequalities. A geographical approach. ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation. 2020;9(10):600. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9100600Kaklauskas A., Zavadskas E.K., Radzeviciene A., Ubarte I., Podviezko A., Podvezko V., Kuzminske A., Banaitis A., Binkyte A., Bucinskas V. Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis. Cities. 2018;72(Pt.A):82–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.002Kaklauskas A., Zavadskas E.K., Radzeviciene A., Ubarte I., Podviezko A., Podvezko V., Kuzminske A., Banaitis A., Binkyte A., Bucinskas V. Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis. Cities. 2018;72(Pt.A):82–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.002Воробьев А.А. Качество жизни как показатель эффективности государственного управления. Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. 2016;(6–1):18–21. DOI: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.48.056Vorobyev A.A. Quality of life as an indicator of governance effectiveness. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatel’skii zhurnal = International Research Journal. 2016;(6–1):18–21. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.48.056

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.